http://blogs.msdn.com/hopperx/archive/tags/VM/default.aspxTags: VMen-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.msdn.com/hopperx/archive/2008/01/11/memorx-incorrectly-displaying-vm-overlap-in-wm6-1.aspxFri, 11 Jan 2008 03:07:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7064430shende11http://blogs.msdn.com/hopperx/comments/7064430.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/hopperx/commentrss.aspx?PostID=7064430Many OEM’s have already noticed that Memory Doctor doesn’t correctly represent VM overlap in some pre-release versions of Windows Mobile. There have been some changes in WM VM architecture that contradict an assumption made by MemoRx which results in...(<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/hopperx/archive/2008/01/11/memorx-incorrectly-displaying-vm-overlap-in-wm6-1.aspx">read more</a>)<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7064430" width="1" height="1">Virtual MemoryKITLVMWM6hoppeRxmemoRxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/hopperx/archive/2007/07/02/saving-vm-by-using-oemdrivershigh-package.aspxTue, 03 Jul 2007 01:42:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3665074wesbarc15http://blogs.msdn.com/hopperx/comments/3665074.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/hopperx/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3665074The release of Windows Mobile 6 (WM6) gave us a few more tools for dealing with Virtual Memory (VM) issues. Compaction of slot 1 is new for WM6, in previous releases all slot 1 modules were aligned on 64k boundaries, causing VM address space to be wasted...(<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/hopperx/archive/2007/07/02/saving-vm-by-using-oemdrivershigh-package.aspx">read more</a>)<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3665074" width="1" height="1">Virtual MemoryVMhttp://blogs.msdn.com/hopperx/archive/2007/02/20/wm6-ce6.aspxTue, 20 Feb 2007 16:15:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1725899shende1http://blogs.msdn.com/hopperx/comments/1725899.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/hopperx/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1725899<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p><FONT face=Verdana></FONT></o:p></P><FONT face=Verdana>There has been some confusion around the OS version supporting Windows Mobile 6. Sue Loh does an excellent job explaining the differences and even some of the “why” in the </FONT><A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ce_base/archive/2007/02/14/windows-mobile-6-and-the-ce-os.aspx"><FONT face=Verdana>CE Base team blog</FONT></A><FONT face=Verdana>. There is additional helpful information in the Comments section that is worth the read.</FONT><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1725899" width="1" height="1">shendeVMWM6CE6