<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Phoiling Phishing at WWW2006</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/05/26/608101.aspx</link><description>If you’re at the WWW2006 conference here in beautiful Edinburgh Scotland, you’ve probably seen a number of great presentations already such as yesterday’s discussion on Identity Management featuring Kim Cameron from the Infocard team. Today (Friday) I’m</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>ckunte.com | Why phishing works</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/05/26/608101.aspx#609799</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 09:13:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:609799</guid><dc:creator>ckunte.com | Why phishing works</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://ckunte.com/archives/2006/05/28/why-phishing-works"&gt;http://ckunte.com/archives/2006/05/28/why-phishing-works&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Phoiling Phishing at WWW2006</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/05/26/608101.aspx#610067</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 16:24:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:610067</guid><dc:creator>Viktor Krammer</dc:creator><description>Hello,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have focused on another aspect of Phishing regarding security issues introduced with Internationalized Domain Names (IDN). The following paper gives an overview of address spoofing attacks and how to specifically deal with the emerging risk of IDN spoofing. I have also implemented and tested the proposed ideas in my free IE add-on Quero.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.quero.at/papers/idn_spoofing.pdf"&gt;http://www.quero.at/papers/idn_spoofing.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Viktor</description></item><item><title>re: Phoiling Phishing at WWW2006</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/05/26/608101.aspx#610390</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 04:48:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:610390</guid><dc:creator>tako</dc:creator><description>Sorry for my ignorance, but what is Phoiling Phishing?</description></item><item><title>re: Phoiling Phishing at WWW2006</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/05/26/608101.aspx#611108</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 23:59:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:611108</guid><dc:creator>EricLaw [MSFT]</dc:creator><description>@Tako: This could be rewritten &amp;quot;Foiling fradulent web sites&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;Using a &amp;quot;ph&amp;quot; instead of a &amp;quot;f&amp;quot; is a fairly common thing in hacker circles.</description></item><item><title>re: Phoiling Phishing at WWW2006</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/05/26/608101.aspx#611473</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 10:58:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:611473</guid><dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator><description>Phishing is definitely a geek term, you should use a more descriptive term in all IE UI.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If someone see's a phishing filter and doesn't know what the term is, how will the feature help them? (and also they'll probably think that someone in the team can't spell 'fishing')</description></item><item><title>re: Phoiling Phishing at WWW2006</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/05/26/608101.aspx#623598</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:30:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:623598</guid><dc:creator>Pacero</dc:creator><description>I mean, that more of pishing end when email communication will be secured and more of spam be filtered at SMTP layer e.g. by SPF or another technology.</description></item></channel></rss>