<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>My first unit test in Visual Studio Team System</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx</link><description>As usual when you sit down and write your first bit of code in a new language or in this case a new unit testing framework what else would you write other then the tested version of Hello World (thanks to Scott Densmore ). In this case the unit testing</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>TDD and Visual Studio Team System</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#146983</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 22:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:146983</guid><dc:creator>RobCaron's Blog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>RE: My first unit test in Visual Studio Team System</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#147146</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 23:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:147146</guid><dc:creator>Roy Osherove</dc:creator><description>Gosh darn it.&lt;br&gt;I try to run the test I made through the test explorer but I keep getting the dreaded &amp;quot;Test Run configuration needed&amp;quot; dialog.&lt;br&gt;Where am I supposed to get one of those?</description></item><item><title>VSTS Unit Testing</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#147284</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 06:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:147284</guid><dc:creator>Kevin Dente's RantLog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: My first unit test in Visual Studio Team System</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#147286</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 04:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:147286</guid><dc:creator>James Newkirk</dc:creator><description>Roy - The only way that I know of how to get the .rcg file is to create a Test Project. I will follow up with the dev team and see if there is another way. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jim</description></item><item><title>a suggestion...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#147942</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 20:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:147942</guid><dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator><description>You could simplify that code by doing:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;using NUnit = Microsoft.VisualStudio.QualityTools.UnitTesting;&lt;br&gt;using NUnit.Framework;&lt;br&gt;using TestCase = TestClass;&lt;br&gt;using TestMethod = Test;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;at the top.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But seriously, why reinvent the wheel on this?  I have no awesome thoughts of porting all of my NUnit-based tests over to this new framework.  Why buck the community on this one?</description></item><item><title>re: My first unit test in Visual Studio Team System</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#147945</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 20:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:147945</guid><dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator><description>or rather..&lt;br&gt;using TestFixture = TestClass;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:)</description></item><item><title>Code Snippets in VS2005</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#148072</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2004 03:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:148072</guid><dc:creator>Todd Kitta's Blog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: My first unit test in Visual Studio Team System</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#148317</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2004 11:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:148317</guid><dc:creator>Dietmar</dc:creator><description>Both csUnit and NUnit use the same attributes for declaring test cases [TestFixture], test methods [Test] and setup/teardown operations [SetUp], [TearDown]. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IMHO I think it would be better and easier to use these well-known attributes in VS2005?!?</description></item><item><title>Geek Notes 2004-06-06</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#149814</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 06:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:149814</guid><dc:creator>Geek Noise</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: My first unit test in Visual Studio Team System</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#151219</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:151219</guid><dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator><description>I really agree with Dietmar on his point about using the standard Attributes.  Unless there is a really good reason this is a disservice to the community.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Unit Testing in Visual Studio 2005</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#155028</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 13:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:155028</guid><dc:creator>NUnitAddin</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Unit Testing in Visual Studio 2005</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#155029</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:155029</guid><dc:creator>NUnitAddin</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Please stop the fragmentation of the testing tools market!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#155124</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:22:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:155124</guid><dc:creator>Darrell Norton's Blog</dc:creator><description>Please stop the fragmentation of the testing tools market!</description></item><item><title>Quick </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#157704</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 03:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:157704</guid><dc:creator>James Newkirk's Blog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Quick </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#157709</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 03:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:157709</guid><dc:creator>James Newkirk's Blog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: Please stop the fragmentation of the testing tools market! </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#157928</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 07:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:157928</guid><dc:creator>peterchen</dc:creator><description>Isn't this what they call &amp;quot;diversity&amp;quot;?</description></item><item><title>Unit test petition at Tech.Ed</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jamesnewkirk/archive/2004/06/02/146834.aspx#169725</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:12:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:169725</guid><dc:creator>Hugo Batista</dc:creator><description>We all want unit testing feature in base vs 2005 versions&lt;br&gt;see &lt;a target="_new" href="http://hugobatista.dotnetx.org/archive/2004/06/30/159.aspx"&gt;http://hugobatista.dotnetx.org/archive/2004/06/30/159.aspx&lt;/a&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>