<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Calling Extension Methods on Null Objects</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jaredpar/archive/2007/11/30/calling-extension-methods-on-null-objects.aspx</link><description>One of the gotchas for Extension Methods is that it's legal to call them on Null References. This isn't really surprising when you think about the feature. Boiled down to a fundamental level, extension methods are just syntactic sugar for calling a static</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Free People Searches &amp;raquo; Calling Extension Methods on Null Objects</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jaredpar/archive/2007/11/30/calling-extension-methods-on-null-objects.aspx#6618753</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:50:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6618753</guid><dc:creator>Free People Searches » Calling Extension Methods on Null Objects</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.absolutely-people-search.info/?p=1518"&gt;http://www.absolutely-people-search.info/?p=1518&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>