<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windows Mobile Executive Guide for Technical Decision Makers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonlan/archive/2008/07/24/windows-mobile-executive-guide-for-technical-decision-makers.aspx</link><description>Rick was kind enough to point out to me that we’ve just released this great guide for Executive Technical Decision Makers.&amp;#160; It outlines the reasons why Windows Mobile is a great platform for Organisations to deploy. It’s available in PDF format to</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Windows Mobile Executive Guide for Technical Decision Makers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonlan/archive/2008/07/24/windows-mobile-executive-guide-for-technical-decision-makers.aspx#8768996</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:28:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8768996</guid><dc:creator>Vit</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, that's nice. But end users don't really enjoy WM as it is, without extensive customization, unlike the iPhone, or great platform stability like Blackberry. So, you may sell it to IT Dept, but if end user have a choice, it would be either blackberry, or iPhone. Make WM user friendly for god's sake!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>