<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Some Balanced Statements Regarding The Open XML BRM</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2008/03/05/some-balanced-statements-regarding-the-open-xml-brm.aspx</link><description>I want to highlight a few comments following the close of the BRM in Geneva. The folks highlighted here are balanced, experienced standards professionals. This is not to say that there are not other standards professionals who hold opposite opinions,</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>MSDN Blog Postings  &amp;raquo; Some Balanced Statements Regarding The Open XML BRM</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2008/03/05/some-balanced-statements-regarding-the-open-xml-brm.aspx#8068103</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:51:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8068103</guid><dc:creator>MSDN Blog Postings  » Some Balanced Statements Regarding The Open XML BRM</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2008/03/06/some-balanced-statements-regarding-the-open-xml-brm/"&gt;http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2008/03/06/some-balanced-statements-regarding-the-open-xml-brm/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Some Balanced Statements Regarding The Open XML BRM</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2008/03/05/some-balanced-statements-regarding-the-open-xml-brm.aspx#8069481</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:39:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8069481</guid><dc:creator>Mike Brown</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm... your title says &amp;quot;Some Balanced Statements...&amp;quot;, but later you freely admit that the &amp;quot;quotes above show the positive side of the spectrum&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, not really &amp;quot;balanced&amp;quot; at all then? &amp;nbsp;Or maybe &amp;quot;Fair and Balanced&amp;quot; would have been a better title? &amp;nbsp;Or failing that, how about &amp;quot;We Report, You Decide&amp;quot;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(On second thought, those latter two may be under some kind of copyright).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Mike&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Some Balanced Statements Regarding The Open XML BRM</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2008/03/05/some-balanced-statements-regarding-the-open-xml-brm.aspx#8073736</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:34:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8073736</guid><dc:creator>André</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Drama?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;...those interested in seeing Open XML succeed are doing the same - making their case that voting yes is the right thing to do.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also known as those hired to get OOXML adopted or get fired when they miss the national objective.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Some Balanced Statements Regarding The Open XML BRM</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2008/03/05/some-balanced-statements-regarding-the-open-xml-brm.aspx#8096912</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:07:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8096912</guid><dc:creator>hAl</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This appears to be the official New Zealand atandards press statement:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.standards.co.nz/news/Media+releases/New+Zealand"&gt;http://www.standards.co.nz/news/Media+releases/New+Zealand&lt;/a&gt;’s+voice+heard+at+Geneva+OOXML+meeting.htm&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Some Balanced Statements Regarding The Open XML BRM</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2008/03/05/some-balanced-statements-regarding-the-open-xml-brm.aspx#8148367</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:48:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8148367</guid><dc:creator>David Mitchell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This whole debate has gotten out of hand and a sense of proportion is needed. All of the standards processes, including the Fast Track ones, are about improving the quality of a standard and building a consensus. That's just what they're meant to do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm sure that some people would see killing the ECMA standard as their only goal, rather than working to improve it, while others want to incrementally improve the standard and make it better for the user community. I'd personally like to see a bit more in the way of positive engagement from the ABM crowd, rather than them saying &amp;quot;I wouldn't start from here&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The name calling that passes for commentary in parts of the blogosphere does not do the IT industry any good - it makes us seem like a bunch of petty minded zealots.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>