<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Parallel.For in .NET 4.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jennifer/archive/2009/06/19/parallel-for-in-net-4-0.aspx</link><description>In version 4.0 of the .NET Framework, there is a lot of support for parallel programming. One cool class to know is System.Threading.Parallel , which contains a number of static methods to parallelize loops and regions. Consider this code which uses a</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Parallel.For in .NET 4.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jennifer/archive/2009/06/19/parallel-for-in-net-4-0.aspx#9811862</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:37:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9811862</guid><dc:creator>developingchris</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;parallel for is cool.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;however benchmarking with datetime objects isn't recommended since its not accurate. Try using stopwatch.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>