<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Developer hearted / Relational minded : ADO.NET</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/ADO.NET/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: ADO.NET</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Need more spare time ? Use SQLIOSimParser to interpret your IO results !</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/2009/09/27/need-more-spare-time-use-sqliosimparser-to-interpret-your-io-results.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:14:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9900011</guid><dc:creator>Jens K. Suessmeyer</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/comments/9900011.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9900011</wfw:commentRss><description>&amp;#160; My colleague Marvelous Jimmy ( JimmyMay ) and myself did a small project to parse and interpret the results of the testing tool SQLIO. It produces ready-to-interpret reports and reusable results in Excel and will save you (as of Jimmy) much time...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/2009/09/27/need-more-spare-time-use-sqliosimparser-to-interpret-your-io-results.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9900011" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2005/default.aspx">SQL Server 2005</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2000/default.aspx">SQL Server 2000</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/.Net/default.aspx">.Net</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/ADO.NET/default.aspx">ADO.NET</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/SQLIOSimParser/default.aspx">SQLIOSimParser</category></item><item><title>Getting feedback / progress from batches and stored procedures</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/2009/05/11/getting-feedback-progress-from-batches-and-stored-procedures.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9602156</guid><dc:creator>Jens K. Suessmeyer</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/comments/9602156.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9602156</wfw:commentRss><description>Ever wanted to get feedback and interim results like a progress from a stored procedure ? Well, not that easy as the results such as PRINT information is send after the batch has been completed. If you want to get information back from your batches you...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/2009/05/11/getting-feedback-progress-from-batches-and-stored-procedures.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9602156" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><enclosure url="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/attachment/9602156.ashx" length="57232" type="application/x-zip-compressed" /><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2005/default.aspx">SQL Server 2005</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2000/default.aspx">SQL Server 2000</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/.Net/default.aspx">.Net</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/ADO.NET/default.aspx">ADO.NET</category></item><item><title>When is random “random enough” ?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/2009/04/08/when-is-random-random-enough.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9537534</guid><dc:creator>Jens K. Suessmeyer</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/comments/9537534.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9537534</wfw:commentRss><description>An interesting question came up in a private conversation. If you want to pick a random value from a random generated result set and want to make sure that the row is really random, is the known ORDER BY NEWID() really random enough ? The point is that...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/2009/04/08/when-is-random-random-enough.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9537534" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2005/default.aspx">SQL Server 2005</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/T-SQL/default.aspx">T-SQL</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/ADO.NET/default.aspx">ADO.NET</category></item><item><title>Checking Failover after setting up a Database Mirroring</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/2009/04/03/checking-failover-after-setting-up-a-database-mirroring.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9530022</guid><dc:creator>Jens K. Suessmeyer</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/comments/9530022.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9530022</wfw:commentRss><description>If you use database mirroring, the essence is that you use an additional connection property which is called “Failover partner” to make the client aware that it can try to connect to another server. If the principal went down or you lost connection to...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/2009/04/03/checking-failover-after-setting-up-a-database-mirroring.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9530022" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><enclosure url="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/attachment/9530022.ashx" length="142442" type="application/x-zip-compressed" /><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/.Net/default.aspx">.Net</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/jenss/archive/tags/ADO.NET/default.aspx">ADO.NET</category></item></channel></rss>