Welcome to MSDN Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

      Loosely Coupled Thinking

      SOA, BPM, Clouds &
      other trendy stuff...

News

  • Better Search:

    Tweets


      Reading

      About

      Not me but an incredibly realistic simulation.
      John Evdemon
      is an Architect
      at Microsoft.

      <legal-stuff>
      The views and opinions stated in this blog are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of Microsoft.
      Each posting on this blog is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
      </legal-stuff>


      Social

      View John Evdemon's profile on LinkedIn

      John Evdemon's Facebook profile





      Locations of visitors to this page

    If Building Architects had to work like Software Architects

    Jorgen Thyme, a .NET architect out of Denmark, recently forwarded a painfully humorous email:

    Dear Mr. Architect,

    Please design and build me a house. I am not quite sure of what I need, so you should use your discretion. My house should have somewhere between two and forty-five bedrooms. Just make sure the plans are such that the bedrooms can be easily added or deleted. When you bring the blueprints to me, I will make the final decision of what I want. Also, bring me the cost breakdown for each configuration so that I can arbitrarily pick one.

    Keep in mind that the house I ultimately choose must cost less than the one I am currently living in. Make sure, however, that you correct all the deficiencies that exist in my current house (the floor of my kitchen vibrates when I walk across it, and the walls don't have nearly enough insulation in them).

    As you design, also keep in mind that I want to keep yearly maintenance costs as low as possible. This should mean the incorporation of extra-cost features like aluminum, vinyl, or composite siding. (If you choose not to specify aluminum, be prepared to explain your decision in detail.)

    Please take care that modern design practices and the latest materials are used in construction of the house, as I want it to be a showplace for the most up-to-date ideas and methods. Be alerted, however, that kitchen should be designed to accommodate, among other things, my 1952 Gibson refrigerator.

    To insure that you are building the correct house for our entire family, make certain that you contact each of our children, and also our in-laws. My mother-in-law will have very strong feelings about how the house should be designed, since she visits us at least once a year. Make sure that you weigh all of these options carefully and come to the right decision. I, however, retain the right to overrule any choices that you make.

    Please don't bother me with small details right now. Your job is to develop the overall plans for the house: get the big picture. At this time, for example, it is not appropriate to be choosing the color of the carpet.

    However, keep in mind that my wife likes blue.

    Also, do not worry at this time about acquiring the resources to build the house itself. Your first priority is to develop detailed plans and specifications. Once I approve these plans, however, I would expect the house to be under roof within 48 hours.

    While you are designing this house specifically for me, keep in mind that sooner or later I will have to sell it to someone else. It therefore should have appeal to a wide variety of potential buyers. Please make sure before you finalize the plans that there is a consensus of the population in my area that they like the features this house has. I advise you to run up and look at my neighbor's house he constructed last year. We like it a great deal. It has many features that we would also like in our new home, particularly the 75-foot swimming pool. With careful engineering, I believe that you can design this into our new house without impacting the final cost.

    Please prepare a complete set of blueprints. It is not necessary at this time to do the real design, since they will be used only for construction bids. Be advised, however, that you will be held accountable for any increase of construction costs as a result of later design changes.

    You must be thrilled to be working on as an interesting project as this! To be able to use the latest techniques and materials and to be given such freedom in your designs is something that can't happen very often. Contact me as soon as possible with your complete ideas and plans.

    PS: My wife has just told me that she disagrees with many of the instructions I've given you in this letter. As architect, it is your responsibility to resolve these differences. I have tried in the past and have been unable to accomplish this. If you can't handle this responsibility, I will have to find another architect.

    PPS: Perhaps what I need is not a house at all, but a travel trailer. Please advise me as soon as possible if this is the case..

    Posted: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 11:08 AM by jevdemon
    Filed under:

    Comments

    Uwe Keim said:

    I guess you could find thousands of those "analogies" both with advantages and disatvantages on the side you prefer more...
    # November 23, 2004 5:54 AM

    John said:

    Someone commented earlier that this simple example isn't that far off from the truth. Regardless, the field of software architecture has a long way to go before we can claim the same level of professionalism as building architects. My team is doing some work in this area for Microsoft that we hope to announce soon. Stay tuned!
    # November 23, 2004 6:56 AM

    Mike Weiss said:

    This is totally unrealistic! The requirements are written down.
    # November 23, 2004 7:26 AM

    Hector Correa said:

    This was funny.

    I love particulary how a smimming pool is on the picture all a sudden, out of the blue, as a very important requirement.

    The line that says "will have to sell it to someone else. [...] therefore should have appeal to a wide variety of potential buyers" is soooooo real. I've been in many projects where the customer demands that the system must be very flexible so that they can sell it to other people -- even though they didn't want to buy any of the existing tools on the market in the first place!

    # November 23, 2004 8:14 AM

    TrackBack said:

    Aaron B. Hockley's DroppedPackets &raquo; Humor: If Building Architects had to work like Software Architects
    # November 23, 2004 11:22 AM

    Sean Gephardt said:

    Too Funny, you must have been listening on some of my recent meetings!
    # November 23, 2004 10:35 AM

    Chad Humphries said:

    That was great.
    # November 29, 2004 5:42 AM

    Bill O'Brien's WebLog said:

    # December 1, 2004 5:31 AM

    BM said:

    I like the PPS: lines; reminds me of another good one liner about clients: "They don't (can't) say what they mean and don't mean what they say"
    # December 7, 2004 11:56 AM

    Building Virus said:

    What about
    - Demo version building with 30 day licence?
    - Service pack (new)building releases?
    - Building Anti-virus security?
    # December 9, 2004 3:26 AM

    TrackBack said:

    # December 16, 2004 10:42 AM
    New Comments to this post are disabled
    Page view tracker