<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Moving the SOA Goalposts</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2008/07/01/moving-the-soa-goalposts.aspx</link><description>SOA is about loosely coupled system integration . Sorry, I meant to say that SOA is about enabling loosely coupled business processes . On the other hand SOA is about reuse , except that its actually not about reuse . Hang on a minute, SOA is like event</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Better Basketball &amp;raquo; Moving the SOA Goalposts</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2008/07/01/moving-the-soa-goalposts.aspx#8679143</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:45:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8679143</guid><dc:creator>Better Basketball &amp;raquo; Moving the SOA Goalposts</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.basketballs-sports.info/better-basketball/?p=1220"&gt;http://www.basketballs-sports.info/better-basketball/?p=1220&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Moving the SOA Goalposts</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2008/07/01/moving-the-soa-goalposts.aspx#8681259</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:24:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8681259</guid><dc:creator>Ron Schmelzer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a good piece ;) Ever thought of getting into the analyst business?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In all seriousness, the goalposts are moving because that's where the customers want them to be. They simply don't want to buy EAI-redux. They don't want more of what they have. They want innovation. And isn't innovation all about improving the status quo?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our perspective on SOA has been EA centric for quite a while now (at least 3 years). It has been steadily moving away from a Web Services-centric vision since that time. And while not all customers or vendors share that vision, we believe Microsoft can profit a lot more from SOA as an EA concept than SOA as a Web Services concept.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That was the point of our message. But read it directly from our research, not from the ZDNet source, and you'll get that detail.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Moving the SOA Goalposts</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2008/07/01/moving-the-soa-goalposts.aspx#8681800</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:21:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8681800</guid><dc:creator>Zubin Wadia</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the goalposts should be movable. Who are we to tell the customer how wide they should be? or even if they should be there? ;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fastest way to get yourself into a bind is to get religious with a particular platform for SOA/BPM/ECM. That enforces goalposts in a myriad of styles upon the customer resulting in them wrapping themselves into a pretzel.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Composites are the way to go. Work with what you need not with what you are given. &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Moving the SOA Goalposts</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2008/07/01/moving-the-soa-goalposts.aspx#8682521</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 03:53:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8682521</guid><dc:creator>jevdemon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Zubin,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think we are in full agreement on this. &amp;nbsp;I was just poking fun at the industry's attempt to define, redefine and contradict itself regarding SOA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Moving the SOA Goalposts</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2008/07/01/moving-the-soa-goalposts.aspx#8689134</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:13:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8689134</guid><dc:creator>matt mcknight</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I've had my own perspective on this for a while- I think the popularity of the term comes the fact the IT is supposed to serve the business- something that was forgotten for a while. &amp;nbsp;That's the &amp;quot;alignment&amp;quot; that most of the places where I do my consulting are looking for. In any case, I've been making my money telling people to say something that means something any time I hear the word SOA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Did you ever wonder what the backbone of SOA is?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://lptf.blogspot.com/2008/01/backbone-of-soa-is-standardization.html"&gt;http://lptf.blogspot.com/2008/01/backbone-of-soa-is-standardization.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>HBR on Susceptibility to Fads (like SOA)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2008/07/01/moving-the-soa-goalposts.aspx#9142751</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:47:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9142751</guid><dc:creator>Loosely Coupled Thinking</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The December issue of the Harvard Business Review contains a compelling article on &amp;quot;Why You Shouldn't&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>