http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/tags/BPM/default.aspxTags: BPMen-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2009/09/22/concept-typedefs-the-holy-grail-of-bpm-and-closing-the-gap-between-business-and-it.aspxTue, 22 Sep 2009 11:01:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9897904jevdemon4http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/comments/9897904.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9897904http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=9897904A typedef is a keyword in both C and C++ used to introduce new names for existing types. A simple typedef declaration lets you define your own names that can be used in place of type specifiers such as int, float, and double. Surprisingly, some people...(<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2009/09/22/concept-typedefs-the-holy-grail-of-bpm-and-closing-the-gap-between-business-and-it.aspx">read more</a>)<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9897904" width="1" height="1">Service OrientationBPEL4WSBPMhttp://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2008/04/18/just-because-you-can-do-something-doesn-t-mean-you-should.aspxFri, 18 Apr 2008 23:39:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8409009jevdemon1http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/comments/8409009.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8409009http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8409009I'm not really doing anything BPEL related these days but a post by Jesper Joergensen caught my eye. Since I'm not focused on BPEL I haven't kept up with some of the developments in the BPM-related blogosphere. Apparently Bruce wrote a post illustrating...(<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2008/04/18/just-because-you-can-do-something-doesn-t-mean-you-should.aspx">read more</a>)<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8409009" width="1" height="1">Service OrientationBPEL4WSProcess and WorkflowBPMhttp://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2008/01/08/bpel4people-and-ws-humantask-to-oasis.aspxWed, 09 Jan 2008 01:05:05 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7033176jevdemon3http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/comments/7033176.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/commentrss.aspx?PostID=7033176http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=7033176The BPEL4People and WS-HumanTask specs are headed to OASIS, resulting in a new BPEL4People Technical Committee (TC) - expect to see an announcement and call for participation soon.&#160; The TC will focus on defining human interactions (&#8220;human tasks&#8221;)...(<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2008/01/08/bpel4people-and-ws-humantask-to-oasis.aspx">read more</a>)<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7033176" width="1" height="1">Service OrientationBPEL4WSProcess and WorkflowBPMhttp://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2007/11/20/dave-on-orchestration.aspxTue, 20 Nov 2007 22:05:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6440450jevdemon2http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/comments/6440450.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/commentrss.aspx?PostID=6440450http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=6440450Dave Linthicum is blogging about orchestration and gets it mostly right. The blog entry does a decent job of describing orchestration at a high level - if you're unfamiliar with orchestration the blog entry is worth a read. The following, however, made...(<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2007/11/20/dave-on-orchestration.aspx">read more</a>)<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6440450" width="1" height="1">Service OrientationBPEL4WSProcess and WorkflowBPMhttp://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2007/11/09/bpel-bpm.aspxFri, 09 Nov 2007 21:03:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6023896jevdemon7http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/comments/6023896.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/commentrss.aspx?PostID=6023896http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=6023896Interesting perspective on SOA and BPM here from Joe , but positioning BPEL as BPM is just wrong. BPM encompasses much more than simple service orchestration. It’s good to see the human element addressed here - there is some interesting work going on...(<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2007/11/09/bpel-bpm.aspx">read more</a>)<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6023896" width="1" height="1">Service OrientationBPEL4WSBPMhttp://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2007/08/29/soa-message.aspxWed, 29 Aug 2007 18:47:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4630753jevdemon7http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/comments/4630753.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4630753http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=4630753SearchWebServices published an article this week wondering if Microsoft "gets" SOA. I think you know my opinion on this but I'm interested in hearing yours. What do you think is Microsoft's SOA message? Feedback/flames/etc are highly encouraged....(<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2007/08/29/soa-message.aspx">read more</a>)<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4630753" width="1" height="1">Service OrientationBPMhttp://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2007/08/06/the-state-of-bpm.aspxMon, 06 Aug 2007 23:44:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4265832jevdemon1http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/comments/4265832.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4265832http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=4265832What a depressing article . I had a few concerns with this article - here are a few: The conclusion that IT should drive BPM couldn’t be more wrong - the "B" stands for "Business", not IT. BPM is not just about technology/app integration. The article...(<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jevdemon/archive/2007/08/06/the-state-of-bpm.aspx">read more</a>)<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4265832" width="1" height="1">BPEL4WSBPM