<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Why does Visual Studio require debugger symbol files to *exactly* match the binary files that they were built with?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jimgries/archive/2007/07/06/why-does-visual-studio-require-debugger-symbol-files-to-exactly-match-the-binary-files-that-they-were-built-with.aspx</link><description>Recently a coworker of mine lost the symbol file for one of his binaries. Because he needed to debug that binary, getting those symbols back was of utmost importance since debugging without them is near impossible. He decided to try and use a symbol file</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Se il compilatore è umorale ...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jimgries/archive/2007/07/06/why-does-visual-studio-require-debugger-symbol-files-to-exactly-match-the-binary-files-that-they-were-built-with.aspx#3745629</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 15:18:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3745629</guid><dc:creator>Claudio Brotto</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Leggevo stamattina questo post di Jim Griesmer . Che mi ha colpito parecchio nella sua conclusione, al&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>