<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The new document look</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joe_friend/archive/2006/05/22/603653.aspx</link><description>The Word team is lucky to have a whole host of very talented people working on it. This is the first of many guest posts where you'll be getting details on the features from the mouths of the feature designers. Stuart J Stuple is a program manager on</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: The new document look</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joe_friend/archive/2006/05/22/603653.aspx#604321</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 04:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:604321</guid><dc:creator>Mauricio DIAZ ORLICH</dc:creator><description>It's funny how my documents already look like Word 2007's new default style :) Except that I like serif fonts for my document's text and sans-serif for the headings (find it easier to read on print.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm glad this change in style is being done, because, although I have my templates I use to get similar results, most people simply don't know how to create presentable Word documents... Even though it's as simple as Format &amp;gt; Paragraph.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll admit that the meaning of the settings in a lot of dialogs might not obvious for many Word users out there, but I do think that Word should force everyone to take a &amp;quot;Using Styles&amp;quot; tutorial before the first use...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really look forward to installing the Office Beta to get to test all these new features I keep reading about in your blogs...</description></item><item><title>re: The new document look</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joe_friend/archive/2006/05/22/603653.aspx#604824</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 18:35:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:604824</guid><dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator><description>To my eyes, that text looks a little too over-antialiased (verging on blurry.) It's much easier to read the Verdana of this blog.</description></item><item><title>re: The new document look</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joe_friend/archive/2006/05/22/603653.aspx#605447</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 03:35:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:605447</guid><dc:creator>A User</dc:creator><description>I agree the spacing is a better default for people who will never grapple with styles. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The font itself looks awful, although that may be an artifact of rendering it into a picture. See Francis comment on anti-aliasing. Not only is it definitely blurry, it is thickened and horizontally crowded.</description></item><item><title>Word 2007 beta 2</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joe_friend/archive/2006/05/22/603653.aspx#605945</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 16:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:605945</guid><dc:creator>Blog-a-Styx</dc:creator><description>Et voil&amp;amp;#224; mon premier post en utilisant Word 2007 Beta 2… Chose assez surprenante&amp;amp;#160;: d&amp;amp;#233;sormais, les retours-chariots...</description></item><item><title>re: The new document look</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joe_friend/archive/2006/05/22/603653.aspx#607390</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 23:20:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:607390</guid><dc:creator>Keith Bertelsen</dc:creator><description>The new fonts and things look shiny and all, but have the math fonts been updated? Has anything been done with the Equation Editor, yet?</description></item><item><title>re: The new document look</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joe_friend/archive/2006/05/22/603653.aspx#608165</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 20:16:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:608165</guid><dc:creator>Jfriend</dc:creator><description>The crappy look of the font is likely my fault in creating the screenshots. Sorry for that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keith, More news on math/equations later. :-)</description></item><item><title>re: The new document look</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joe_friend/archive/2006/05/22/603653.aspx#613655</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 04:25:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:613655</guid><dc:creator>paulbridges02</dc:creator><description>This is a blogging comment, but i could no longer post a topic on the blogging topics. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am using moveable type from sixapart and host my own blog and my own pictures so I have run into a few problems and wanted to know if they had been looked at yet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) I upload with FTP so I eed to be able to supply a username and password along with the destination folder for my image uploads to work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) When I type html code into the post it is twisting it around a bit. I type this: &amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;img src=”Images/MenuSample.jpg”&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;and I get this: &amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;lt;img src=”Images/MenuSample.jpg”&amp;amp;gt &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;in the post if i go online to edit it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3) I also cannot select the category for my post currently &lt;br&gt;(assuming this has to do with the blogging software I am using).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the help!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Excellent Past Word Posts</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joe_friend/archive/2006/05/22/603653.aspx#772885</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:44:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:772885</guid><dc:creator>The Microsoft Office Word Team's Blog</dc:creator><description>In an effort to live up to this blog's 'All things Microsoft Office Word...' subtitle, here are some...</description></item><item><title>Word 2007&amp;#8217;s new look for documents &amp;laquo; MogBlog</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joe_friend/archive/2006/05/22/603653.aspx#774275</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:03:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774275</guid><dc:creator>Word 2007’s new look for documents « MogBlog</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://dancmorgan.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/word-2007s-new-look-for-documents/"&gt;http://dancmorgan.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/word-2007s-new-look-for-documents/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Single spacing should be single spacing</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joe_friend/archive/2006/05/22/603653.aspx#3927266</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:39:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3927266</guid><dc:creator>E-Bitz - SBS MVP the Official Blog of the SBS "Diva"</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.mydigitallife.info/2006/12/11/switch-and-change-back-to-office-2003-default-font-and-style"&gt;http://www.mydigitallife.info/2006/12/11/switch-and-change-back-to-office-2003-default-font-and-style&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>