<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Maxi-Microsoft</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/johngossman/archive/2005/01/09/349501.aspx</link><description>Mini-Microsoft is always an interesting read, for the pure uniqueness of its iconoclasm, and the odd thrill of wondering who might be the author. So it is with some reluctance that I have come to realize: Mini-Microsoft is just plain wrong. Yes, Microsoft</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Maxi-Microsoft</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/johngossman/archive/2005/01/09/349501.aspx#351264</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:351264</guid><dc:creator>SmartWombat Blog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Msft is acutally kinda small</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/johngossman/archive/2005/01/09/349501.aspx#351768</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2005 01:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:351768</guid><dc:creator>Bloga de Nathan</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: Maxi-Microsoft</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/johngossman/archive/2005/01/09/349501.aspx#363561</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 08:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:363561</guid><dc:creator>Don</dc:creator><description>Finally some one speaks out against Mini-Microsoft.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is good stuff.</description></item></channel></rss>