<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Neither Mort Nor Elvis</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/johnmont/archive/2006/04/25/583680.aspx</link><description>In a post about the role of the personas that for several years have defined developer division's thinking about the VB user (Mort), the C# user (Elvis), and the C++ user (Einstein), Scott Bellware says: Microsoft will probably remain bogged down in embarrassing</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Neither Mort Nor Elvis</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/johnmont/archive/2006/04/25/583680.aspx#583829</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:42:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:583829</guid><dc:creator>Scott Bellware</dc:creator><description>Hi John,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for setting me straight on the origin of the personas. &amp;nbsp;Had I written more responsibly, I suspect I should have attributed the personas to the effort of putting a product to market, rather than merely to marketing folks. &amp;nbsp;More precisely then, my assertion is that the personas originated through people working with marketing concerns - demographic behavioral analysis for example - regardless of their title or primary job function.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looking forward to greater improvements in Orcas. &amp;nbsp;Although, I sure wish y'all would just stop and get Whidbey right, though. &amp;nbsp;Orcas is a long time to wait for clean usability that we had in VS 2003 that went away with the introduction of a few new surprise features in VS 2005.</description></item><item><title>re: Neither Mort Nor Elvis</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/johnmont/archive/2006/04/25/583680.aspx#583834</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:48:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:583834</guid><dc:creator>johnmont</dc:creator><description>What features in 2005 surprised you? I'm not sure we can do very much at this point, but what specific features do you most like and least like in 2005?</description></item><item><title>re: Neither Mort Nor Elvis</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/johnmont/archive/2006/04/25/583680.aspx#584209</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:22:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:584209</guid><dc:creator>Scott Bellware</dc:creator><description>John,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's a subject for a blog entry of it's own. &amp;nbsp;When I get time, I'll put my least favorite features and usability-obstructing features of Visual Studio 2005 in a list.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's disheartening that Microsoft doesn't have a value system like those found in agile development organizations that would allow for and enable design imperatives that provide for greater variability and adaptation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I dream of a Visual Studio subjected to the software design exigences of Test-Driven Development</description></item><item><title>re: Neither Mort Nor Elvis</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/johnmont/archive/2006/04/25/583680.aspx#590161</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 22:58:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:590161</guid><dc:creator>Richard Murillo</dc:creator><description>When reviewing the personae documentation I found that Scott is right that developers don't cleanly fit into one specific silo, but they do span multiple silos which are adjecent to one another. I know plenty of developers that are Mort with Elvis tendencies (I myself am an Elvis with Einstein tendencies).</description></item></channel></rss>