<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>How the OS Loader will force .Net v1.0/1.1 executables to run under WOW64 on a 64-Bit Machine</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx</link><description>[10/15, 2:04pm, fixed a couple typos; 10/15, 4:51pm, clarified a point] Before you read this entry, you might want to read these two entries: - http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/03/13/89163.aspx - http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/03/11/88280.aspx</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Thanks!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx#243076</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 22:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:243076</guid><dc:creator>Danny Thorpe</dc:creator><description>Thanks for the update!</description></item><item><title>re: How the OS Loader will force .Net v1.0/1.1 executables to run under WOW64 on a 64-Bit Machine</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx#243108</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:243108</guid><dc:creator>Jasper22</dc:creator><description>Thanks</description></item><item><title>.Net 1.0/1.1 applications on Win64</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx#243520</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2004 10:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:243520</guid><dc:creator>Junfeng Zhang's .Net Framework Notes</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>I'm not dead.  Really.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx#243641</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:243641</guid><dc:creator>Open-node.net</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Great articles on 64-bit .NET</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx#243664</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 01:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:243664</guid><dc:creator>Tim's Web Log</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Great articles on 64-bit .NET</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx#243665</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 01:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:243665</guid><dc:creator>Tim's Web Log</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: How the OS Loader will force .Net v1.0/1.1 executables to run under WOW64 on a 64-Bit Machine</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx#244681</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:244681</guid><dc:creator>mikeb</dc:creator><description>Maybe the IMAGE_COR20_HEADER structure should be updated to reflect the fact that the MajorRuntimeVersion and MinorRuntimeVersion fields have nothing to do with the runtime version.  This may make things a bit less confusing down the road.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: How the OS Loader will force .Net v1.0/1.1 executables to run under WOW64 on a 64-Bit Machine</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx#244707</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:244707</guid><dc:creator>Josh Williams (MS)</dc:creator><description>Changing the header really isn't an option at this point... It would be nice... but, oh, the joys of backwards compatibility.</description></item><item><title>Assembly ProcessorArchitecture and Binding Policy</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx#366904</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:366904</guid><dc:creator>Junfeng Zhang's .Net Framework Notes</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Assembly ProcessorArchitecture and Binding Policy</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx#368908</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:368908</guid><dc:creator>Junfeng Zhang's .Net Framework Notes</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Flipping bits on managed images to make them load with the right bitness...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx#415192</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 22:20:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:415192</guid><dc:creator>Josh Williams</dc:creator><description>In a number of blog entries I have discussed how on 64-bit machines .Net applications can run as either...</description></item><item><title>64 bit and managed code</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx#904022</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:06:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:904022</guid><dc:creator>BizTalk 2006 - Windows SharePoint Services adapter</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This article covers some 64 bit aspects regarding managed code and COM+ applications. The 64 bit info&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>64 bit and managed code</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx#904126</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:45:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:904126</guid><dc:creator>BizTalk 2006 - Windows SharePoint Services adapter</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This article covers some 64 bit aspects regarding managed code and COM+ applications. The 64 bit info&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Flipping bits on managed images to make them load with the right bitness... &amp;laquo; Millicent Carr News</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx#2761066</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 08:13:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2761066</guid><dc:creator>Flipping bits on managed images to make them load with the right bitness... « Millicent Carr News</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://millicentboh.wordpress.com/2007/05/21/flipping-bits-on-managed-images-to-make-them-load-with-the-right-bitness/"&gt;http://millicentboh.wordpress.com/2007/05/21/flipping-bits-on-managed-images-to-make-them-load-with-the-right-bitness/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>assembly loading | keyongtech</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx#9338435</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:36:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9338435</guid><dc:creator>assembly loading | keyongtech</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.keyongtech.com/452231-assembly-loading"&gt;http://www.keyongtech.com/452231-assembly-loading&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>ODBC driver for XP64 | keyongtech</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/joshwil/archive/2004/10/15/243019.aspx#9361645</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:32:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9361645</guid><dc:creator>ODBC driver for XP64 | keyongtech</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.keyongtech.com/219099-odbc-driver-for-xp64"&gt;http://www.keyongtech.com/219099-odbc-driver-for-xp64&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>