<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Solution Architect vs Enterprise Architect: Central Planning</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/kaevans/archive/2007/04/16/solution-architect-vs-enterprise-architect-central-planning.aspx</link><description>Nick Malik has a great blog on Central Planning , comparing a city council's zoning board to enterprise architects. The pull-quote from that post: Most IT architects don't understand the boundary between solution architecture and enterprise architecture.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Solution Architect vs Enterprise Architect: Central Planning</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/kaevans/archive/2007/04/16/solution-architect-vs-enterprise-architect-central-planning.aspx#2154452</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:07:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2154452</guid><dc:creator>NickMalik</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Kirk,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any comparison between myself and Pat Helland is a compliment of the highest order. &amp;nbsp;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;--- Nick&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>