<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>XML != Object</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/kaevans/archive/2003/11/19/38682.aspx</link><description>Confusion arises because there's no commonly accepted definition of what an object is, let alone what an object model is. XML schema definitions map to some languages' OO concepts cleanly in some aspects and don't map at all in other aspects. One commonly</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: XML != Object</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/kaevans/archive/2003/11/19/38682.aspx#38696</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:38696</guid><dc:creator>Mathew Nolton</dc:creator><description>Kirk, you are correct about people's understanding about what goes over the wire. people talk about xml web services as this great thing...which it is. but in order for microsoft to make it ubiquitous they hid everything so that anyone can create a basic service without really any understanding of what is going on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i strongly encourage everyone to use something like tcptrace.exe (a little shareware tool that let's you peak at what is coming and going over the wire) as well as WebServices Studio (which gives a huge amount of functionality) and getting to know wsdl (a very powerful construct).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Mathew Nolton</description></item><item><title>re: XML != Object</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/kaevans/archive/2003/11/19/38682.aspx#38715</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2003 01:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:38715</guid><dc:creator>Brad More</dc:creator><description>While I agree that XML != Object, I find it useful to think about how my data will look (modeled as objects) when I code my XSD schemas and the Type section of the WSDL contract.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I take it that you encounter the &amp;quot;glazed look&amp;quot; a lot more from people who build web-services from code out rather than WSDL in... ?</description></item><item><title>Blogs and RSS &amp;raquo; Kirk Allen Evans&amp;#8217;s Blog : XML != Object</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/kaevans/archive/2003/11/19/38682.aspx#8238794</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 09:49:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8238794</guid><dc:creator>Blogs and RSS » Kirk Allen Evans’s Blog : XML != Object</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogrssblog.info/kirk-allen-evanss-blog-xml-object/"&gt;http://blogrssblog.info/kirk-allen-evanss-blog-xml-object/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>