<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>A Brief History of Phoenix</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/kangsu/archive/2005/11/16/493744.aspx</link><description>Earlier I told you that Phoenix exists, but without much additional information. To give you a deeper understanding in the what and why of Phoenix, let's start off with two related questions: What can Phoenix do for you? And what can Phoenix do for Microsoft?</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: A Brief History of Phoenix</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/kangsu/archive/2005/11/16/493744.aspx#497086</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:56:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:497086</guid><dc:creator>hskoglund</dc:creator><description>With Phoenix it could be possible to implement an equivalent of VB6's immediate window in VC++.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ok, we've had the QuickWatch dialog box for a while now (VC4 I believe). But it's restricted to oneliners. And you cannot write say, i = time(NULL), or even i = time(0). Also, QuickWatch cannot be invoked in design mode, i.e. your program has to be running in debug mode for QuickWatch to be enabled.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In some mixed VC6/VB6 projects I've participated in, invariably some VB6 guy would brag how easy and helpful the immediate window pane is for him, and how C++/MFC developers have to manage without it. Perhaps armed with Phoenix the situation could change...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;/Rgrds Henry</description></item><item><title>re: A Brief History of Phoenix</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/kangsu/archive/2005/11/16/493744.aspx#498755</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:23:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:498755</guid><dc:creator>kanggatl</dc:creator><description>Interesting idea Henry.  I must admit that I don't know much about this VB6 Window, but I'll have to take a look at it to see how it could be enabled by Phoenix.  I do appreciate the fresh thinking.  We do hope to be able to enable a lot of new things with Phoenix.</description></item><item><title>re: A Brief History of Phoenix</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/kangsu/archive/2005/11/16/493744.aspx#642182</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 02:52:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:642182</guid><dc:creator>lumenMikie</dc:creator><description>Altering the executable is a capability that can be used for good or for bad. Piracy is a big issue for us as I'm sure it is for Microsoft. Would you care to comment on safeguards you are considering to prevent unauthorized modification of executables?&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;Mike</description></item><item><title>Is Microsoft moving away from VC++?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/kangsu/archive/2005/11/16/493744.aspx#3379417</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:10:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3379417</guid><dc:creator>Fuziness and Cognizance... </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Finally I am back in office from TechMela. My plans to do live blogging about TechMela did not materialize&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>