http://blogs.msdn.com/kevinpilchbisson/archive/2008/10/27/virtualization-update.aspxJust a quick update.&#160; After my previous post, I actually stopped using virtualization for most cases, since I found the performance hit to be too significant.&#160; While the automation I mentioned before still doesn’t support HyperV, I hand builten-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.msdn.com/kevinpilchbisson/archive/2008/10/27/virtualization-update.aspx#9018370Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:22:33 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9018370infoblog &raquo; Virtualization Update<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.a-foton.ru/index.php/2008/10/27/virtualization-update/">http://blog.a-foton.ru/index.php/2008/10/27/virtualization-update/</a></p> http://blogs.msdn.com/kevinpilchbisson/archive/2008/10/27/virtualization-update.aspx#9019056Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:02:24 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9019056Rik Hemsley<p>VMs under Hyper-V seem to run much closer to bare metal speed for us too. Now we don't think twice about running stuff in VMs provided the host machine has enough resources.</p>http://blogs.msdn.com/kevinpilchbisson/archive/2008/10/27/virtualization-update.aspx#9019428Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:29:29 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9019428Jay Bazuzi<p>Nice!</p> <p>I guess it's time to get excited about virtual machines again.</p>