Welcome to MSDN Blogs
Sign in
|
Join
|
Help
Ken Levy's Blog
RSS 2.0
Atom 1.0
Home
Search
Go
Tags
Community
Gadgets
Miscellaneous
Movies/Music
Travel
Ultimate Ears
Visual FoxPro
Visual Studio
VSX
Windows Live
Archives
July 2008 (1)
April 2008 (3)
March 2008 (1)
February 2008 (1)
January 2008 (1)
October 2007 (1)
September 2007 (1)
August 2007 (1)
July 2007 (2)
June 2007 (3)
April 2007 (3)
July 2006 (1)
June 2006 (2)
May 2006 (5)
April 2006 (16)
March 2006 (13)
February 2006 (1)
January 2006 (2)
December 2005 (2)
November 2005 (6)
October 2005 (13)
September 2005 (1)
August 2005 (1)
July 2005 (2)
June 2005 (5)
May 2005 (18)
April 2005 (7)
March 2005 (10)
January 2005 (1)
December 2004 (7)
September 2004 (1)
August 2004 (3)
July 2004 (3)
June 2004 (9)
Thursday, October 27, 2005 3:19 PM
klevy
VB and C# considerations for VFP developers
A few weeks ago, there was a thread on the
Universal Thread
asking which .NET language VFP developers should select for those interested in learning and using .NET, primarily those VFP developers adding .NET to their programming skill set. I received positive feedback from my UT reply post, so I thought I'd re-post it here on my blog:
The
VB team
and the
C# team
have different goals and focuses in some areas. C# focuses more on the pureness of the language and avoiding language bloat (fewer commands, more object based syntax, etc.). Most C# developers prefer writing their own source code to things rather than using libraries or higher level language commands that do things for them. The VB team is focused more in productivity, ease of use, ease of discovery, and higher level language features. VB 2005 has My dot making access to many .NET Framework and common features very easy and fast to use/discover, etc., plus many more code snippets for common actions/functions. The VB team likes the idea of query language embedded into VB to be more like what developers already know in SQL Server (SQL language, VFP, etc), while C# views it more like an object syntax into an API and lower level. There are some XML related features being planned for future VB that are much like TEXT MERGE in VB, and this is something that may not be in C# for example. The goal of the C# and VB teams are not to match feature for feature nor to match syntax, but instead to focus on their core audience of developers which has some divergence.
In some cases, it may be that a C# developer uses VB for some components (maybe data querying for example) and simply embeds the various components into one solution (meaning, some written in VB and some in C#). Some of the VFP team developers including
Calvin Hsia
and Aleksey Tsingauz (Aleksey wrote the CursorAdapter, XMLAdapter, SQL language enhancements to
VFP 9.0
, new data-types in the VFP engine, etc.) are helping the VB team with the future data-centric programming features like referencing the VFP 9.0 C++ code base for LINQ query functions, SQL language implementation, etc. as well as making the IntelliSense in VB with data a first class experience. Many of the
Sedna
components (the ones that use .NET via interop) will be written in VB (mostly code name
VB 9.0
, the version after
VB 2005
) with the new data/LINQ features.
Alan Griver
and I have been talking about these .NET language divergence issues for over 3 years now, and only until recently have the differences been more noticeable (ie, data-programming differential). More information is available online about
future versions of .NET programming
.
Filed under:
Visual FoxPro
,
Visual Studio
Anonymous comments are disabled
About klevy
http://blogs.msdn.com/klevy/about.aspx