For those of you wanting more information about Master Data Services, in 2010, Profisee is starting a series of webinars that should be great.
Here’s the first one: http://www.profisee.com/newsevents/tabid/134/Default.aspx
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
In a recent blog I mentioned that the Master Data Services team would be blogging soon. Matt Anderson has started and this should be a great resource for readers wanting to come up to speed on MDS quickly. We're planning some high level as well as in-depth blogging there. If you are interested in better understanding the newest addition to the SQL Server toolset, be sure to add this link to your blogroll!
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/mds_team/archive/2009/12/14/welcome-to-the-sql-server-master-data-services-team-blog.aspx
Thanks,
Universe.Earth.Software.SQLServer.MDS.Kirk
These kinds of things always seem to be the last to be added to the documents. I saw in a recent blog post that someone had gotten a staging table error and they weren't sure what it was.
Here are the staging table error codes thanks to our great support engineer Pam Matthews
| ERR210000 |
OK |
| ERR210001 |
Error - duplicate code in source data. |
| ERR210003 |
Error - code does not exist or has been deactivated for selected domain attribute. |
| ERR210004 |
Error - code does not exist for selected domain attribute. |
| ERR210006 |
Error - inactive member code. |
| ERR210007 |
Warning - redundant assignment; transaction will not be logged. |
| ERR210008 |
Error - may not stage inactive parents. |
| ERR210009 |
Error - member code does not exist. |
| ERR210010 |
Error - target code does not exist. |
| ERR210011 |
Error - target code may not be leaf when staging parent relationships. |
| ERR210012 |
OK - new relationship record. |
| ERR210013 |
OK - new collection record. |
| ERR210014 |
OK - relationship removed (moved to unused). |
| ERR210015 |
Error - Children must be unique in Non Mandatory Hierarchy. |
| ERR210016 |
Warning - unable to assign relationship or recursive relationship. |
| ERR210017 |
Error - user name is invalid. |
| ERR210018 |
Error - Model is required or invalid Model. |
| ERR210019 |
Error - model administrator privileges are required to stage into the selected model. |
| ERR210020 |
Error - Entity is required or invalid entity name. |
| ERR210021 |
Error - member type ID must be 1 (leaf member), 2 (parent member), 3 (collection), or 5 (collection member). |
| ERR210022 |
Error - system attributes may not be updated via staging. |
| ERR210023 |
Error - file attributes may not be updated via staging. |
| ERR210024 |
Error - attribute value exceeds allowed length. |
| ERR210025 |
Error - data is the incorrect datatype for requested attribute (must be Numeric). |
| ERR210026 |
Error - data is the incorrect datatype for requested attribute (must be DateTime). |
| ERR210027 |
Error - data is the incorrect datatype for requested attribute (must be Integer). |
| ERR210028 |
Error - invalid attribute name. |
| ERR210029 |
Error - attribute value is required. |
| ERR210030 |
Warning - attribute value will be unassigned. |
| ERR210031 |
Error - Attribute_Value must be either ''Active'' or ''De-Activated'' when attempting to change the member status. |
| ERR210032 |
Error - hierarchy is required or invalid hierarchy. |
| ERR210033 |
Error - collections may only be staged to entities that have a hierarchy. |
| ERR210034 |
Error - selected MemberCode is a reserved word. Please select another code. |
| ERR210035 |
Error - code is required without a code generation business rule. |
| ERR210036 |
Information - code is not required for a code generation business rule. |
| ERR210037 |
Error - member type ID must be 1 (leaf member), 2 (parent member), or 3 (collection). |
| ERR210038 |
Error - hierarchy is required if member type is 4; or invalid hierarchy. |
| ERR210039 |
Error - member type ID must be 4 (hierarchy) or 5 (collection). |
| ERR210040 |
Error - member code is required. |
| ERR210041 |
Error - may not use reserved code ''ROOT''. |
| ERR210042 |
Error - may not use reserved code ''MDMUNUSED''. |
| ERR210043 |
Error - target type ID must be 1 (parent) or 2 (sibling). |
| ERR210044 |
Error - target code is required. |
| ERR210045 |
Error - may not use reserved code ''MDMUNUSED'' in non-mandatory hierarchies. |
| ERR210046 |
Error - may not stage a sibling of the Root node. |
| ERR210047 |
Error - may not stage a sibling of the Unused node. |
| ERR210048 |
Error - member code and target code may not be the same. |
| ERR210049 |
Error - may not stage siblings for collections. |
| ERR210050 |
Information - hierarchy is not required for collections. |
| ERR210052 |
Error - The member cannot be deactivated because it is referenced by an entity. |
I'm sure these will show up in the documentation at some point, but for now there here for your reference.
As we head into the US holiday season, I wanted to catch up on some things I've wanted to blog for some time.
Blogs Rolling
First of all, it's good to see some blogging activity around MDS.
As is the usual case around the first release of a product, it takes some time for blog activity to get momentum. But, we're beginning to see some action now as folks pick up the November CTP of SQL Server R2 and start to put it through it's paces.
This one by Nick Barclay is a series of seven introducing MDS and how to build a model and starts to get into the data model a bit as well.
For those just picking up the product for the first time, this is an excellent quick start guide.
http://nickbarclay.blogspot.com/2009/11/beginning-master-data-services-part-1.html
Intrepid blogger and SSIS/MSBI geek Jamie Thomson has also been digging into the product and started blogging and he promises more to come.
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/jamie_thomson/archive/2009/11/21/first-sighting-of-sql-server-master-data-services-mds.aspx
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/jamie_thomson/archive/2009/11/13/mds-is-x64-only.aspx
Roland Lenz gives a pretty good summary of MDS and talks a little about scenarios in which it can be used.
http://blogs.technet.com/swisseb/archive/2009/05/14/what-s-hot-on-sql-server-2008-r2.aspx
Chris Webb blogged about John McAllister's recent presentation at PASS.
http://cwebbbi.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!7B84B0F2C239489A!5288.entry
For those that missed it, I have a short entry here that talks at a high level about the product and Master Data Management in general.
http://blogs.technet.com/dataplatforminsider/archive/2009/05/13/master-data-services-what-s-the-big-deal.aspx
Shaun Ryan has also started to blog and has one about creating hierarchies in MDS here.
http://shaun-ryan.spaces.live.com/?_c11_BlogPart_BlogPart=blogview&_c=BlogPart&partqs=cat%3dMDS
The MDS team will be blogging as well. Look for those blogs to show up soon and I'll link here.
Matt Anderson has already created the first entry: Installing and Configuring Master Data Services 2008 R2 November CTP
Hooo, that's a mouth full. Fortunately, it takes about as long to say it as it does to do it! As soon as we can get the blog up and running, he'll be posting that entry with more to follow.
What's New
There are various comments about what's new in the November CTP MDS relative to the original product Microsoft acquired. Some have said it's basically the same thing. I'd like to give you all some background on that. For the benefit of those who are familiar with the Stratature product or the technology preview we released over a year ago, I'll briefly list some of the more important improvements. Later, I'll drop some hints as to what's coming next. But keep it between me and you.
Performance
The team has been doing some great work around improving the performance of the product. We've improved the schema, optimized stored procedures, and changed the way we manage key elements such as business rules to be more efficient. This work has resulted some great performance improvements. In some cases, the improvements are orders of magnitude faster.
Hygiene
We've done a load of work on security, accessibility, globalization and localization (21 languages), better setup and configuration.
UI Spif
While the user interface is mostly the same, we have done some changes to improve the experience including fixing bugs and swapping the control library for better management.
Model Deployment
The perenial problem with building models is how to deploy them from the machine where they were developed without a lot of difficulty. And what's more, how do you build a model template and use it over and over without said efforts? Model deployment. With Model Deployment, you can build an entire model, including data on a development machine, deploy it to a test lab for testing and then easily deploy to the live production machines without ever getting your hands dirty. It's also useful for building pre-developed models for solution specialists or for sharing across the enterprise. While competitor products can sometimes take weeks to setup, configure and build the first model, I've done a demo where I setup, configured, deployed a model and built a derived hierarchy in roughly 10 minutes. That's simpler, easier and faster. That's Microsoft software.
WCF API
We've added a comprehensive API to the product with both bulk and message oriented functions. Then we rewrote the user interface to go through the API instead of directly to the database/stored procedures. Anything you can do through the UI and more, you can now do through the API. It is complete and comprehensive.
So, while the product looks pretty much the same, much of the work we've been doing is to build the MDS platform into something that will support a rich set of experiences, integrations and additional scenarios.
What's Next?
It's a little early to be talking about the next version don't you think? OK, well, let's just say we're going to improve the user interface, integration and out of box experience and a few other goodies.
Well, that's certainly a mouth full.
I’m pleased to say that the SQL Server November CTP with Master Data Services is now available.
http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/R2.aspx
If you’re interested in simply seeing the MDS documentation, you can find it here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee633763(SQL.105).aspx
The branding is in.
MICROSOFT SQL SERVER 2008 R2 MASTER DATA SERVICES, MONTH COMMUNITY TECHNOLOGY PREVIEW (MONTH CTP)
Where MONTH is the actual release month.
Hooo! What a mouthful.
It's been a while since my last post so wanted to take some time and update folks on what's happening around Master Data Services.
A little history
To catch everyone up, I thought I'd start by giving a short history of the product and get everyone on the same page.
In June, 2007 Microsoft acquired a company called Stratature. It was a small but well run company that built an analytical master data management solution. At the time, we were looking for a good solution to augment the PerformancePoint offering as well as a way to pull together various master data management capabilities for Office servers such as CRM and SharePoint. The focus was on bringing the master data to the people who understood it best. Who knows the customers, products, vendors, parts and other key business data better than the business users? MOSS (Microsoft Office SharePoint Server) seemed the logical ship vehicle and still makes a lot of sense for a business user perspective. Delivering the master data management stewardship experience throughout the enterprise by placing it in the hands of business users continues to be our strategy, however, after feedback from partners, customers and our field, we believed that the ship vehicle needed to change to better align with the sales motions, field expertise, R&D teams, marketing and underlying technologies. We weighed and considered different options and ultimately decided that SQL Server was a better fit. While delivering the master data experience to the business user continues to be a priority, the "master data" piece of MDM, the "management" piece is also important. What happens in the back end management experience is every bit as important as how the stewardship and governance experience is delivered to the business user. As purveyors of a master data platform, we have to provide both.
Project "Bulldog" was a codename for the overall master data management project leading up to shipping as part of SQL Server. When we acquired Stratature, there were a few minor issues with the product, we were a small team, and the number of customers relative to Microsoft's typical customer base was quite small. We made the difficult decision to remove the product from the market so that the small team could focus on shipping a Microsoft quality product. We shipped a technology preview that was picked up by nearly 200 customers and partners. The technology preview was, essentially, a hygiene build of the Stratature bits with a few libraries removed, some simple modifications to improve the product security, and some bug fixes.
The technology preview ran for over a year and was successful at building interest as well as providing an outlet for customers to use the product for initial evaluation purposes and building proofs of concept solutions. A few, we understand, have gone a little further with the product then we expected.
Throughout this time, we've been busy improving the product on multiple dimensions including performance, flexibility, extensibility, localization and feature/function. To date, master data management solutions have been risky, expensive and difficult to implement. Master data management isn't all about technology. In fact, the technology is really about enabling the processes that lead to authoritative master data. But, the technology is important and we believe that we will make master data management technology truly available to enterprise and mid-market companies both from an implementation and affordability perspective.
What now?
We're now closing in on the first Microsoft release of a master data solution. Master Data Management isn't a household name, but as companies struggle with managing one of their most important assets in a consistent way with ever increasing complexity of IT ecosystems, dynamic business environments and stringent regulations the need for a way to manage key business data is critical. There is a lot of information out there about master data management, the need and the solutions. Unfortunately, much of it is confusing, contradictory and unbounded by reality. The space is maturing however, and you'll begin to see more and more about this important problem and the ways to solve it in the coming years.
Here's what's happening with the product now:
- We're stabilizing and putting the finishing touches on the product for release in SQL Server 2008 R2 CTP3.
- We're finalizing TAP customer selection
- We're working with a number of services partners who are building service lines around MDS
- We're working with a number of ISV partners to build components and integration with MDS
- We're already planning the next release!
Some resources
For those of you unfamiliar with MDM and Microsoft's forthcoming solution, or if you just want to drill down some more, here's a few links to get you started.
http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/MDS.aspx - This is the official SQL Server website.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb190163.aspx - A brief introduction Roger Wolter and I wrote.
http://mdmbook.com/ - David Loshin's companion site for his excellent MDM book.
Universe.Earth.Software.Microsoft.SQLServer.MDS.KirkHaselden
As announced at TechEd earlier this week, Master Data Services will be shipping in SQL Server 2008 R2.
I've blogged on SQL Insiders about it here: http://blogs.technet.com/dataplatforminsider/default.aspx
I'm glad I can be out of the SQL Server closet again and finally say in public, It's good to be back in SQL Server!
As announced at TechEd earlier this week, Master Data Services will be shipping in SQL Server 2008 R2.
I've blogged on SQL Insiders about it here: http://blogs.technet.com/dataplatforminsider/default.aspx
I'm glad I can be out of the SQL Server closet again and finally say in public, "It's good to be back in SQL Server!"
A while back I blogged about the Technology Preview for the Master Data Management product that we released to just about anyone that was interested. That was very early in the project and right after we had acquired the Stratature company. The preview was a success. In fact, we've had great response to it and many customers have actually used the preview edition in pre-production implementations and giving us great reports and feedback. Microsoft is also using the product for several internal implementations. Over all, we're happy with the technology preview and feel it's run it's course.
Now that the team is focused on delivering the next version of the product as well as preparing for the first CTP release and accompanying TAP, we've discontinued the Technology Preview. This will give us more time to focus on delivering a quality release and gives our customers and partners some time to transition to planning around the forthcoming CTP and TAP.
As I mentioned in my last entry, we'll be formally announcing the go to market plans for the master data management product soon. If the number of emails in my inbox is any indication, interest in Microsoft's MDM offering is really heating up. For those that may be wondering if the Stratature product lives on, I can definitely say yes. The core capabilities will be there, the people that came to Microsoft from Stratature are still part of our team and contributing with those that have joined since to deliver the next release.
Folks who wanted to be on the Technology Preview but didn't make the cut off date don't need to wait long as the TAP is around the corner.
Thanks,
Universe.Earth.Software.Microsoft.SQLServer.KirkHaselden
I've been vacant from blogging for some time. If the comments I've been getting in the blog, email and personally at conferences and in meetings is any indication, it's high time I started back again. Unlike some of the more successful and prolific bloggers out there, or those that aren't so prolific for that matter, I have no aspirations of consistently writing every day. The old blogging mantra "every day a blog entry" is not something I'm going to commit to doing. That way I set myself up for success. This is a lot like my annual new years resolution which I always manage to keep with smashing success which is "I will only make one resolution this year." I like that because I'm guaranteed success the moment I make the resolution. It's an atomic success. By making the resolution I'm successfully keeping it. So, my blogging commitment here is that I won't be consistent. That's something I can commit to not doing.
So, what's happening in my world. True to Microsoft's disclosure policy, I could tell you all but then, the marketing folks would kill me, or worse... What I can tell folks is that the Master Data Management team is alive and thriving. We're doing good work, making progress on deliverables, getting ready to ship. Our plan hasn't changed with respect to timing of the release either. We're still targeting a release for roughly the same time as the next version of Office. That date hasn't been announced of course, so I can't say exactly when that is either, but if the past is prologue, you can take a pretty good guess at when that will be.
Our team has completed new functionality and are now stabilizing the product for a prerelease to be announced during TechEd in May. We will be rolling out a lot of new information and announcing some exciting changes to the Microsoft Master Data product at that time. Folks that are interested should watch the TechEd wires. We're excited about the changes and the benefits we derive from them both from a customer satisfaction perspective as well as a technical, strategic and value perspective.
Well, there you go. I've now succeeded at fulfilling my resolution to inconsistently blog. Hopefully it won't take me another year to get the next post done!
Universe.Earth.Software.Microsoft.Office.MDS.KirkHaselden
Few people can call their boss their friend. In my case, he was both and more. Bill was a guy that I could talk to about anything. He was my mentor and opened doors for me in ways that I never thought possible. He's leaving Microsoft and I believe Microsoft is the worse for it.
You can read a little about him here:
Bill hired me into the SQL Server team. He was my GM when I was just getting my feet under me as a developer. Later he was there when I needed a formal mentor. He was the one that provided the opportunity for me to begin a new business at Microsoft and supported the effort throughout the initial business plan development through to where we are today, building a brand new product in Office. There aren't a lot of people at Microsoft that get a chance to do something like that.
Thanks Bill and good luck!
Back in November of last year I mentioned that we were shipping the MDM Technology Preview early. Since that time we've had great response to the program. Over 100 customers, partners and Service providers have enlisted in the technology preview. Some of our customers are currently building proof of concept implementations. Every day we get more requests to download the technology preview and these days, most of the requests are from customers. If you're interested, the link above will take you to the previous post that explains how to get involved.
Some have confused this release with a TAP or CTP. It is neither of those. While those programs entail a high touch relationship between Microsoft and the participants, the technology preview is an unsupported release. This means that while customers can ask questions on the Microsoft Connect site forum, there is little dialog between Microsoft and the technology preview customers. It's simply a way for customers to have access to the early bits to help them plan and prepare for the next release.
I've been pretty quiet here lately. Mostly it's because I've been heads down on building the MDM team. I'm glad to say that the team is in high gear now. We're in full on development mode and have made substantial progress towards enhancing and augmenting what will become our offering in the next release of Office as well as long term planning for providing customers with substantial improvements upon what is available in market today.
With yesterday's announcement about the Zoomix acquisition, things are coming together nicely and it should be clear that Microsoft is serious about helping customers solve their master data challenges. We're also serious about building an MDM ecosystem and have been busy about building partnerships with multiple MDM vendors. These discussions are in progress so it wouldn't be appropriate to give details at this point, but if you're in the industry, you'd know these companies. We hope to be able to announce these partnership agreements in the coming months.If you are an ISV and are interested in our free training coming to a location near you, please let me know and I'll send you all the details.
Well, I haven't been active here for some time, but I've been wanting to get back to blogging and this is the perfect opportunity.
While speculation has been in the air for some time, it's actually official now.
Microsoft has provided data quality/cleansing capabilities with the likes of Integration Services fuzzy lookup components, but the Zoomix acquisition brings an overall platform data quality solution at the right level in the Microsoft stack. Naturally, the Microsoft Master Data Management team is excited at the possibilities this presents for our customers and we'll be working with the SQL Server team going forward to integrate the Zoomix and other DQ capabilities into the master data application.
More later.
Last week I had the opportunity to speak to a user group about SQL Server and in particular Integration Services. It was a nice opportunity to clear out the cob webs and talk about one of my favorite topics. https://www.clicktoattend.com/invitation.aspx?code=122496
Initially, it wasn't going so well. I've found that the audiences vary for these events drastically. The closer one gets to Redmond, the more up to date the audience is on newer technologies. So, it's good to do a gut check sometimes and find out if what I'm saying is actually making sense to the audience. In this case, I was talking about what's new in SQL Server Integration Services 2008 and Master Data Management. Well, as I started talking about what's new, the audience began to get the glazed look on their faces.
So, I asked some more questions and it became apparent quite clearly why that was. When I asked how many were currently using SSIS, only a few hands went up. But, when I asked how many were using DTS, I believe every person in the room raised their hand. I'd had an off by one version error.
Super, so I switched gears and gave a talk that I've been giving for ~4 years. What's new in SSIS 2005.
Suddenly, lights went on in people's eyes. The guy over on the far left woke up. People started asking questions, real questions.
Overall, it was a fun experience. It's always cool to rub elbows with folks that are using the product and give constructive feedback and encouragement.
Leonardo Junquera runs that group and does a great job. Thanks for the opportunity to speak Leo!
K