CTMS & EDC: A system to do both - and more

Published 16 February 09 06:49 PM | ljordan 

Interesting how weeks become months when you're writing and updating blogs.  This CTMS project certainly hasn't gone away, but it did go on a bit of a hiatus while my "day job" intervened.  Enough excuses.  Mea Culpa.  On to the fun!

As we discussed in the previous post, the key to a clinical trials management system is thinking of it in terms of a project - after all, the people who run the clinical trial think of it in terms of a project, and it is measured in project management terms, so why not treat it that way from an architectural point of view?

A second and equally important "requirement" is one that we are increasingly seeing as an industry trend: having EDC (Electronic Data Capture) functionality and CTMS (Clinical Trials Management System) functionality in the same system, or at the very least having EDC and CTMS closely integrate and interoperate.

The clinical trials world of today is fairly fractured.  Think of all the different systems - often standalone systems - that are used by Life Science organizations:

  • EDC - Electronic Data Capture
  • CTMS - Clinical Trials Management Systems
  • CLIP - Clinical Investigator Portals
  • Project - Clinical Trials Project Management
  • Analysis - OK, it's SAS, but how do you get the data there?  What about real-time analytics?
  • IRB & DSMB - Outside organizations with their own management systems, like a Click Commerce Research Compliance Automation solution?

What if you could have a system that gets close to doing all of that - or at least being able to manage all of it - through one interface?  How much would that save in training costs, integration costs, and implementation costs?

Well - that's the vision.  Here's how we pull it off:

  1. Start with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 and SQL Server 2008 as the foundation to build upon.
  2. As discussed in the last post, we'll use Microsoft Office Project Server as a way to organize the information and provide us with a trial specific taxonomy, along with roll-up of reporting metrics.
  3. To cover the EDC aspects, we'll utilize Microsoft Office Forms Server 2007 - which is a web facing InfoPath solution - to handle data entry and front-ending the workflow for data checks, etc.

EDC forms in Forms Server can even handle digital signatures (with compliance and security being the subject of a future post) inside the InfoPath forms.  This has implications for those organizations that are involved with SAFE BioPharma (worth checking out).

The beauty of all of this is that it is all Web Service enabled, which means that you have easier integration mechanisms with existing analysis and EDC systems:

  • SAS - With integration with .NET, SOAP, and Web Services.
  • Medidata - We've demonstrated use of their Web Services API module that utilizes CDISC.
  • Perceptive Informatics - At the DIA annual meeting a couple years ago, we did a demonstration using DataLabs (now Perceptive) and InfoPath integration, using Web Services and about 5 lines of code!
  • EHR/EMR Integration - While it is still on the horizon, I think it is getting closer.  Check it out.

Resources to get you started:

Finally - there are other organizations and software vendors that are thinking along these lines.  Check out the following solutions:

 

Next up in this series:

  • Using MOSS templates for maintaining Part 11 compliance
  • Extranets & Identity Management
  • Architecture Diagrams & Screen shots
  • Validation and compliance

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

# Roxanne said on February 26, 2009 2:25 PM:

What a compelling article. Would you care to share this on a community blog? The Canadian BioTechnologist 2.0 Blog is a communal effort devoted to the productivity of the Canadian Biotechnology sector and the fine people who take part in this profession. We are inviting bench scientists and technologists to contribute content: posters, tools, research, presentations, articles, white papers, multimedia, music downloads and entertainment, conference announcements, videos etc. Additionally, we are interested in publicizing the work of your organization. Generally, we are looking for 250 - 500 word articles.

Please feel free to visit the blog.

http://cbt20.wordpress.com/

# Michael Naimoli said on March 4, 2009 3:03 PM:

Great concise article, Les.  I really enjoyed it and it's good to see this information pulled into one place.  EDC and CTMS together sounds obvious doesn't it?  It's suprising that it isn't brought together or thought of together.  The MSFT platform is a great place to pull the data and the processes together.  

# Sonny Kim said on April 5, 2009 9:19 PM:

You might be interested in an opensource software product called Jumper 2.0 that does almost exactly the same thing. Instead of Sharepoint they use a PHP scripted interface, instead of SQL it sits on mySQL, one big difference is that they use Web 2.0 on the front end to allow users to directly create references to any data. You can find it at http://www.jumpernetworks.com

# Alan Churchill said on April 14, 2009 8:38 AM:

When you are ready on the SAS/.NET front, drop me a line. That is my whole world, good and bad.

Alan

# Ken Lownie said on April 27, 2009 6:00 PM:

There is another piece of the puzzle in my analysis, Les, which is the place to store the essential study documents.  EDC is all about data capture, and CTMS is all about process management, but at the core of the problem is still the requirement to manage the extensive set of documents -- CV's, Investgational Brochures, Consent Forms, Form 1572's -- that constitute the traditional "binder".  The good news of course is that SharePoint is the ideal platform for managing those documents.

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 

  
Enter Code Here: Required

Search

This Blog

Syndication

Page view tracker