<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Dynamic Data samples: Custom metadata providers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcinon/archive/2008/05/22/dynamic-data-samples-custom-metadata-providers.aspx</link><description>In part 1 of the Dynamic Data samples series I discuss how to implement custom metadata providers.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Dynamic Data samples: Custom metadata providers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcinon/archive/2008/05/22/dynamic-data-samples-custom-metadata-providers.aspx#8556729</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 19:37:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8556729</guid><dc:creator>jkergosi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post! &amp;nbsp;I'm glad to see that the MetadataProviderFactory &amp;nbsp;is taking shape. &amp;nbsp;We're looking at doing the true dynamic metadata like you mentioned, and are looking at having a data provider from the database. &amp;nbsp;To do so, it does not appear that we will be able to use the strongly typed approach, but rather use a model similar to your previous XML provider approach. &amp;nbsp;Could you make the source for the XML metadata provider available for us to use as reference?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jason Kergosien&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;jasonk at ingensystems.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Dynamic Data samples: Custom metadata providers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcinon/archive/2008/05/22/dynamic-data-samples-custom-metadata-providers.aspx#8589978</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:39:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8589978</guid><dc:creator>Ole Jakobsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice post! Just what we need, as our existing solution uses Dynamic Metadata as well as Dynamic Data.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dynamic Data and the Associated Metadata Class</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcinon/archive/2008/05/22/dynamic-data-samples-custom-metadata-providers.aspx#8606623</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:13:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8606623</guid><dc:creator>David Ebbo's ASP.NET blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If you've used Dynamic Data or watched some demos, you may have been puzzled by the way metadata is associated&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Caching in ASP.NET Dynamic Data</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcinon/archive/2008/05/22/dynamic-data-samples-custom-metadata-providers.aspx#8773860</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:12:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8773860</guid><dc:creator>Jim O'Neil's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;One question that came up at my presentation to the Maine Bytes user group this week centered around&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>MetadataType attribute</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcinon/archive/2008/05/22/dynamic-data-samples-custom-metadata-providers.aspx#9001730</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:06:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9001730</guid><dc:creator>Jo-wen Mei</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the usage of attributes, mostly because it keeps my code clean. At the moment, I&amp;amp;#39;m working&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>