<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Dependency management: Coupling and cohesion</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcod/archive/2006/02/06/AssembliesCouplingCohesion.aspx</link><description>Dependency management turns ugly when Assembly A gets a transitive dependency (in red, the slash means ‘derived’) to Assembly C even if Assembly A apparently does not depend directly to nothing in Assembly C: The evolution of large-scale designs with</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Interesting Finds</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcod/archive/2006/02/06/AssembliesCouplingCohesion.aspx#525630</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 16:21:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:525630</guid><dc:creator>Jason Haley</dc:creator><description /></item></channel></rss>