<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>How is Windows Mobile related to Windows CE?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/04/22/how-is-windows-mobile-related-to-windows-ce.aspx</link><description>I keep getting the question “How is Windows Mobile related to Windows CE?” To be more precise I get lots of questions that don’t make sense if you understand the relationship between CE and Windows Mobile. So for my own sanity I'm going to document it</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: How is Windows Mobile related to Windows CE?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/04/22/how-is-windows-mobile-related-to-windows-ce.aspx#410878</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 20:25:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:410878</guid><dc:creator>Windows Mobile ISV - Developer</dc:creator><description>It's not true that a &amp;quot;developer can rely on the features being present and operating in the expected way.&amp;quot;  The problem is that MS expects WM to be a standard platform, but still allows the OEMs to modify the sources.  If it's meant to be a common experience like the desktop, why doesn't MS ship OEMs just the binaries like they do with the desktop?  My dev team spends more than 50% of its time working on device-specific issues exactly because MS does NOT enforce a standard WM  OS image.  The &amp;quot;paper definition of required functionality&amp;quot; is often laughably ignored&amp;quot;, but the OEMs still claim to ship &amp;quot;Windows Mobile.&amp;quot;  Windows CE should be the platform if the device developer wants to roll its own, and WM should be a standard platform for a consistent consumer exeprience.</description></item><item><title>Blog link of the week 16</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/04/22/how-is-windows-mobile-related-to-windows-ce.aspx#411522</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 23:58:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:411522</guid><dc:creator>Daniel Moth</dc:creator><description>Blog link of the week 16</description></item><item><title>The Mobile Minute 94</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/04/22/how-is-windows-mobile-related-to-windows-ce.aspx#412385</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 05:50:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:412385</guid><dc:creator>Nino.Mobile</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: How is Windows Mobile related to Windows CE?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/04/22/how-is-windows-mobile-related-to-windows-ce.aspx#412961</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:55:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:412961</guid><dc:creator>WM OEM Engineer</dc:creator><description>Actually, OEMs cannot modify the base WM image.  There are logo tests that validate the OS components to ensure they have not changed from what MS released.  If there is a mismatch, then the device does not recieve logo and therefore cannot be called a WM based device....</description></item><item><title>re: How is Windows Mobile related to Windows CE?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/04/22/how-is-windows-mobile-related-to-windows-ce.aspx#413185</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:00:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:413185</guid><dc:creator>Scott Arnold</dc:creator><description>What about the early years of Windows CE?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From what I can tell, the finished Microsoft OS running on early handheld devices was called &amp;quot;Windows CE&amp;quot;.  This seems to be true for Windows CE versions 1.0 (nov 1996), 2.0 (late 1997), and 3.0 (June 2000). Windows CE isn't clearly a separate piece until Windows Mobile 2003 (June 2003).  I've also found reference to a Windows CE 4.0 (March 2002) but have no idea what the OS was called that year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I could be wrong about alot of this, as I have never given PDAs any thought until just recently when I needed to do some research on them for work.  I'm just going by various sources I've found on the web (many of which could be inaccurate or misleading).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's all very confusing.</description></item><item><title>re: How is Windows Mobile related to Windows CE?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/04/22/how-is-windows-mobile-related-to-windows-ce.aspx#413192</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:07:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:413192</guid><dc:creator>Scott Arnold</dc:creator><description>Note that I was limiting my scope to PDAs, which for the Microsoft inspired platform is the Pocket PC.  However, before Windows CE 3.0 they were called &amp;quot;Palm-sized PCs&amp;quot;, and I am uncertain as to whether these would be considered PDAs.</description></item><item><title>Quelle diffrence entre Windows Mobile et Windows CE ?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/04/22/how-is-windows-mobile-related-to-windows-ce.aspx#414351</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 21:22:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:414351</guid><dc:creator>Smartnaute - Windows Mobile Smartphone au quotidien</dc:creator><description>Ce billet de Marcus complte  merveille le billet prcdent publi sur smartnaute et intitul &amp;amp;quot;Dcouvrez l'histoire de Windows Mobile, des annes 90 au futur Magneto&amp;amp;quot;.</description></item><item><title>re: How is Windows Mobile related to Windows CE?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/04/22/how-is-windows-mobile-related-to-windows-ce.aspx#414649</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 17:59:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:414649</guid><dc:creator>marcpe</dc:creator><description>I have posted my answers to these comments here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="https://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/05/04/414644.aspx"&gt;https://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/05/04/414644.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Marcus</description></item><item><title>re: How is Windows Mobile related to Windows CE?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/04/22/how-is-windows-mobile-related-to-windows-ce.aspx#561777</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 12:04:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:561777</guid><dc:creator>Neelam</dc:creator><description>I am new to this site. But after going through this i found it useful and thought of posting my query here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am currently working on Image Update feature provided by Windoes Mobile. Has anybody tried applying packages to the WM OS image? I tried that by writing the package name in the menifest file (pkgs.lst) along with the image name. The image gets downloaded to the NAND Flash on the device but package copying gives me error. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please let me know if somebody has any experience with packages.</description></item><item><title>Windows Mobile开发工具介绍 </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/04/22/how-is-windows-mobile-related-to-windows-ce.aspx#670656</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:23:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:670656</guid><dc:creator>zfyhhp</dc:creator><description>Windows Mobile开发工具介绍 </description></item><item><title>Marcus Perryman's WebLog : How is Windows Mobile Related to Windows CE (2)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/marcpe/archive/2005/04/22/how-is-windows-mobile-related-to-windows-ce.aspx#750226</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:02:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:750226</guid><dc:creator>Marcus Perryman's WebLog : How is Windows Mobile Related to Windows CE (2)</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="https://blogs.msdn.com:443/marcpe/archive/2005/05/04/414644.aspx"&gt;https://blogs.msdn.com:443/marcpe/archive/2005/05/04/414644.aspx&lt;/a&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>