<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Viewing a Workflow's Definition in Xoml </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/markhsch/archive/2005/09/28/475033.aspx</link><description>I attended a "get to know your son's/daughter's teacher" event last night for my son's new school (new in that it is still under construction). A major theme I took away is that teaching styles have drastically changed in the little bit of time I've been</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Viewing a Workflow's Definition in Xoml </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/markhsch/archive/2005/09/28/475033.aspx#475203</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:47:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:475203</guid><dc:creator>pli</dc:creator><description>Cool stuff! Where can I find XOML specs, anonated XSD, etc?</description></item><item><title>Is XOML a DOA feature? ...or is WWF Beta 1 just a very poor implementation?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/markhsch/archive/2005/09/28/475033.aspx#483796</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:00:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:483796</guid><dc:creator>Michael Herman (Parallelspace)</dc:creator><description>There really are a lot of shortcomings in the WWF beta 1 of XOML.  A key omission is that lack of support for storing the workflow layout ...which is absolutely key for business analysts ...and especially for the state machine workflow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Michael Herman&lt;br&gt;Parallelspace Corporation</description></item><item><title>re: Viewing a Workflow's Definition in Xoml </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/markhsch/archive/2005/09/28/475033.aspx#583562</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:23:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:583562</guid><dc:creator>John Portnov</dc:creator><description>I downloaded WFPad (Beta 2).  It is really cool.  It reminds me of Lab 10 (WWF using DesignerControl).  I really like that you can apply XAML/XOML changes visually directly to the Workflow.  I have a few questions for you.

Is it possible to talk to you on the phone?

Sincerely,
John Portnov</description></item><item><title>re: Viewing a Workflow's Definition in Xoml </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/markhsch/archive/2005/09/28/475033.aspx#1071267</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 01:21:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1071267</guid><dc:creator>George</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;There is another way of doing this that I found.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I had trouble doing what you suggested above. It kept on having an XOML file with just the header line and no body.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any way it was that large a workflow to redo in XOML.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But while doing it I notice you can graphically copy and paste the code based flow into the xoml based flow. You lose layout, but you lose layout with the above method as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title> Mark Schmidt s Abode Viewing a Workflow s Definition in Xoml | Quick Diets</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/markhsch/archive/2005/09/28/475033.aspx#9722935</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:29:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9722935</guid><dc:creator> Mark Schmidt s Abode Viewing a Workflow s Definition in Xoml | Quick Diets</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://quickdietsite.info/story.php?id=1717"&gt;http://quickdietsite.info/story.php?id=1717&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>