<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Silverlight and the Dynamic Language Runtime</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/markjo/archive/2007/05/24/silverlight-and-the-dynamic-language-runtime.aspx</link><description>I was talking to my new teammate, the honorable Dr. Andrew Sithers (not sure if he honorable or not, but thought it sounded good), about Silverlight and it's ability to harness the power of dynamic languages inside Silverlight 1.1 (the one with .NET in</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Mark Johnston's Developer Experiences : Silverlight and the Dynamic Language Runtime</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/markjo/archive/2007/05/24/silverlight-and-the-dynamic-language-runtime.aspx#2843667</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 18:03:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2843667</guid><dc:creator>Mark Johnston's Developer Experiences : Silverlight and the Dynamic Language Runtime</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/markjo/archive/2007/05/24/silverlight-and-the-dynamic-language-runtime.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/markjo/archive/2007/05/24/silverlight-and-the-dynamic-language-runtime.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Silverlight Cream for May 24, 2007</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/markjo/archive/2007/05/24/silverlight-and-the-dynamic-language-runtime.aspx#2844597</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 19:05:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2844597</guid><dc:creator>Community Blogs</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Cream , as in &amp;amp;#39;Pick of the Litter&amp;amp;#39; is always subjective, but this is my list for today as I view&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>