<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>A Marvellous Point : Performance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/martinkearn/archive/tags/Performance/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Performance</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>How do you fancy a 51% performance increase in SPS 2003?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/martinkearn/archive/2006/03/15/how-do-you-fancy-a-51-performance-increase-in-sps-2003.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:551822</guid><dc:creator>Martin.Kearn@Microsoft.com</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/martinkearn/comments/551822.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/martinkearn/commentrss.aspx?PostID=551822</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/martinkearn/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=551822</wfw:comment><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;Sounds too good to be true does'nt it?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;Microsoft have just released some test results that compare the performance of SharePoint Portal Server 2003 on SQL 2000 vs. SQL 2005. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;Using SQL 2005 improves performance on every type of SharePoint farm configuration, but the most notable is a 51% increase in RPS (Requests Per Second)&amp;nbsp;for a medium server farm under SQL 2005. The full table is:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE border=1&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;Farm Type&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;SQL 2000 RPS&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;SQL 2005 RPS&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;Increase&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;Small&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;75&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;97&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;+29%&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;Medium&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;131&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;198&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;+51%&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;Large&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;1015&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;1114&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;+10%&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;Extra Large&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;1638&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;1932&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;+18%&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;You can get to the full test here: &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;A href="http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/assistance/HA100993571033.aspx"&gt;&lt;FONT face=Tahoma size=2&gt;http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/assistance/HA100993571033.aspx&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=551822" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/martinkearn/archive/tags/Performance/default.aspx">Performance</category></item></channel></rss>