<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windows Vista - Why wait?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mayurk/archive/2005/11/11/492010.aspx</link><description>Zdnet has an article titled Gartner: Ignore Vista until 2008 . It was an interesting read in the sense it made me write after a long hiatus. It talks about Vista being evolutionarily better that XP. Very little was mentioned about the features that are</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Windows Vista - Why wait</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mayurk/archive/2005/11/11/492010.aspx#492030</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 08:39:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:492030</guid><dc:creator>PatriotB</dc:creator><description>Good ol' Gartner.  The article is supposed to explain why you shouldn't upgrade to Vista right away.  It states in one sentence &amp;quot;Gartner highlights some of the weaknesses in Microsoft's platform strategy.&amp;quot; and then in the very next sentences, gives a reason why you SHOULD upgrade to Vista: IE protected mode.</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Vista - Why wait</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mayurk/archive/2005/11/11/492010.aspx#492049</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 11:21:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:492049</guid><dc:creator>anon</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;Security? You must have missed rootkit removal. How come Microsoft is not that concerned over this. I am not even echoing the Sony BMG story. I have been plagued with horrid rootkits in the past, and I none of Microsoft products have helped. Needless to say, I am not holding my breath about Vista.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Vista - Why wait</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mayurk/archive/2005/11/11/492010.aspx#492051</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 11:27:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:492051</guid><dc:creator>anon</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;Also,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Information organization and retrieval&amp;quot; : Windows Explorer is still a single tab application. How productive indeed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;User experience&amp;quot; : what corporations need now is a budgeted retrain. That means money cranked out for nothing really productive. Also, the new start menu was obviously developed and tested by developers only.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Media center : see it&amp;quot; : well, there are reviews of vista media center out there. Just read them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Winfx, IE7 : all of this is (or will be) available on Windows XP. So what are you talking about?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Games&amp;quot; : Xbox 360. Your post is still about Vista?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Vista - Why wait</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mayurk/archive/2005/11/11/492010.aspx#492171</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 01:38:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:492171</guid><dc:creator>qwerty</dc:creator><description>guess what bozo. ie7 is available for xp and opera is better anyway. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;guess what bozo. no game maker for the pc is going to require vista because so many 2k/xp boxes are out there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;guess what bozo. copernicus, google desktop search (and even msn!) have integrated search products now, at the price of zero dinero.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;guess what bozo. if you'd rtfa you'd know that most of the security can be added (for free) to xp too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;keep being a good microserf spreading fud. i hope you get 2.5'd for being ingratiating, unoriginal and dumb.</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Vista - Why wait</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mayurk/archive/2005/11/11/492010.aspx#494791</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 11:10:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:494791</guid><dc:creator>Granny Smith</dc:creator><description>Why wait for Vista at all when you could be running Mac OS X now or on Intel boxes six months earlier than Vista. Mac OS X Tiger delivered all the promises of Vista a whole year before and everyone knows Leopard (due out the same time) is going to be much better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mac OS X has always been more secure, far better looking, far more stable and original - it's interface was all Apple's idea - Vista's interface was Apple's idea, which Microsoft helped themselves to... What else is new?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just go to www.apple.com/macosx/ and read for yourselves. Hell, I could think of more than 7 reasons to switch to Mac OS X Tiger in less than 15 mins!</description></item><item><title> Being a new PM at Microsoft Windows Vista Why wait | debt solutions</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mayurk/archive/2005/11/11/492010.aspx#9756813</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:28:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9756813</guid><dc:creator> Being a new PM at Microsoft Windows Vista Why wait | debt solutions</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://debtsolutionsnow.info/story.php?id=8153"&gt;http://debtsolutionsnow.info/story.php?id=8153&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>