<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Shared Points for SharePoint : TypeMock</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/TypeMock/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: TypeMock</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>New Version of SharePoint SiteConfigurator Feature Released!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/2009/01/16/new-version-of-sharepoint-siteconfigurator-feature-released.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:37:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9331007</guid><dc:creator>Stian Kirkeberg</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/comments/9331007.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9331007</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;We have just released a new version of the SharePoint &lt;a href="http://www.codeplex.com/spsiteconfigurator" target="_blank"&gt;SiteConfigurator feature on codeplex.com&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;#160; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;In this release we have focused on some new features and making sure the build is stable. This involved some refactoring as well as splitting the project in three parts, one for the code and logic, one part for the feature and one test project. This new structure will make it much easier and faster to reuse the project from farm to farm.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;As the release notes states, we also focused on: &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;ul&gt;   &lt;li&gt;split VS project in two for easier maintenance and upgrades&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;added Type Mock project (simply remove that project from the solution if you don't use it)&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;rewrote log functionality&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;added verbose logging option&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;fixed disabling of web part toolbar (still some minor issues here)&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;made the complete solution independent of it's features names.&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;Added provisioning of files and make it possible to choose welcome page based on xml parameter&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;Added support for links with parameters in AddQuickLaunchLinks &lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;Created support for QuickLaunchHeading and&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;DeleteQuickLaunchHeading elements.&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;Rearranged and refactored the main project&lt;/li&gt;    &lt;li&gt;Fixed some bugs &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Enjoy the new release and please give us feedback so we can improve it further!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9331007" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/developer/default.aspx">developer</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/Sharepoint/default.aspx">Sharepoint</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/SharePoint+development/default.aspx">SharePoint development</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/Visual+Studio/default.aspx">Visual Studio</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/Codeplex/default.aspx">Codeplex</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/TypeMock/default.aspx">TypeMock</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/Unit+testing/default.aspx">Unit testing</category></item><item><title>Unit testing MOSS part 2 (of 2)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/2008/12/08/unit-testing-moss-part-2-of-2.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9184742</guid><dc:creator>Jan Tore Lamøy</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/comments/9184742.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9184742</wfw:commentRss><description>In the 1. article on Unit testing MOSS I described some of the findings and experience on unit testing SharePoint applications using the TypeMock Isolator framework. In this 2. article I will provide some examples of unit tests. Code under test You should...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/2008/12/08/unit-testing-moss-part-2-of-2.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9184742" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/developer/default.aspx">developer</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/Sharepoint/default.aspx">Sharepoint</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/MOSS/default.aspx">MOSS</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/SharePoint+development/default.aspx">SharePoint development</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/Testing/default.aspx">Testing</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/TypeMock/default.aspx">TypeMock</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/TypeMock+Isolator/default.aspx">TypeMock Isolator</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/Unit+testing/default.aspx">Unit testing</category></item><item><title>Unit testing MOSS part 1 (of 2)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/2008/12/03/unit-testing-moss-part-1-of-2.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9169639</guid><dc:creator>Jan Tore Lamøy</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/comments/9169639.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9169639</wfw:commentRss><description>Some of our team members, including me and Frank Jusnes , were recently responsible for providing recommendations on how to unit test in SharePoint projects, and this is an overview of our findings and experiences. This is the first of two posts on the...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/2008/12/03/unit-testing-moss-part-1-of-2.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9169639" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/developer/default.aspx">developer</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/Sharepoint/default.aspx">Sharepoint</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/MOSS/default.aspx">MOSS</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/SharePoint+development/default.aspx">SharePoint development</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/Testing/default.aspx">Testing</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/TypeMock/default.aspx">TypeMock</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/TypeMock+Isolator/default.aspx">TypeMock Isolator</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/Unit+testing/default.aspx">Unit testing</category></item><item><title>TypeMock for SharePoint!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/2008/11/27/typemock-for-sharepoint.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9147410</guid><dc:creator>Frank Jusnes</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/comments/9147410.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9147410</wfw:commentRss><description>My colleague Tommy wrote a post about unit testing SharePoint applications a few weeks ago. I must admit that this is something that I have considered hard to apply to my SharePoint projects, and have therefore avoided it (with a very bad conscience)....(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/2008/11/27/typemock-for-sharepoint.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9147410" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/Sharepoint/default.aspx">Sharepoint</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/Testing/default.aspx">Testing</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/TypeMock/default.aspx">TypeMock</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/mcsnoiwb/archive/tags/TypeMock+Isolator/default.aspx">TypeMock Isolator</category></item></channel></rss>