Welcome to MSDN Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

How did we get here?

In our research for Outlook 12, we* found that less than 30 percent of Outlook users use the Tasks portion of Outlook, despite the fact that during site visits, we saw that people desperately needed help organizing the action items they need to do. From our site visits, we found that people didn’t use Tasks in Outlook because a) inputting tasks was too hard, b) Tasks were hidden in a part of Outlook that few people visit, and c) the implementation of Tasks in Outlook did not provide a useful enough experience to compel users to visit it.

We then did research to figure out how to modify Outlook in order to help people to be more effective at managing their time. We looked at many different time management systems, including Getting Things Done by David Allen, Take Back Your Life! By Sally McGhee and her Microsoft training course, Managing Actions, The Organized Executive by Stephanie Winston, the Franklin Covey/Quest model, Time Management from the Inside Out by Julie Morgenstern, among others.  What we found were some common themes:

  1. Create lists of things to do and remember
  2. Do tasks during scheduled time; set deadlines
  3. Organize by project
  4. Merge everything into one list

Several time management systems suggested ways to use Outlook’s existing time management system, but they seemed hampered, rather than helped by the technology. Thus, we tried to work out these problems by introducing the following four major feature areas:

  1. Easier task input
    1. Flagging: We modified flagging to make it date-based and in some sense, to force the question: “when am I going to get to this?”
    2. Task Input Panel: We wanted to give people an easy, always-visible place to input tasks by typing a single line of text. Giving people a simple way to get tasks into the system helps people create lists of things to do and remember – instead of keeping it in their heads.
  2. To-Do Bar (lightweight task management): We wanted to provide people with a way to see their upcoming tasks and appointments without switching context to a heavyweight task manager. To merge everything into one list, we made the task list in the To-Do Bar include flagged items and tasks. We also encouraged other Office applications to make task creation easier and they did – OneNote now has flagging that creates tasks in Outlook (OneNote 2003 had Outlook task creation, but now it is even simpler), Project now creates tasks in Outlook, and downloaded SharePoint task lists automatically appear in the To-Do Bar if they are assigned to you.
  3. Tasks on the Calendar (time-based task management): We wanted to provide people with a way to easily schedule their tasks and look back on their calendar to see the full spectrum of what they had accomplished – with both tasks and appointments. To achieve this, we added the Daily Task List below the Calendar in weekly and daily views. Dragging a task from the Daily Task List onto the Calendar automatically schedules an half hour appointment to do that task.
  4. Categories: We also modified categories, giving them color, and made them available on almost all item types (mail, calendar, contacts, tasks, notes.) The hope is that people will use categories to organize their tasks by project, but with categories, we retained a great deal of flexibility; categories can be used any way one chooses.
I hope that the new Outlook 12 time management features work well for you and I look forward to your feedback.

-Melissa

 *I am using “we” in this post because I am not alone in doing the research for the time management system in Outlook 12. All of the credit goes to Hank Leukart, Jeff Smith, Glenn Frankel and others on the Office team.

Published Wednesday, November 30, 2005 6:16 PM by mmacbeth
Filed under:

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

# re: How did we get here?

Lack of Daily Task List, like my old Franklin planner had, is the main reason I don't use Outlook tasks. Looking forward to this feature...
Wednesday, November 30, 2005 9:43 PM by tzagotta

# re: How did we get here?

Nice stuff. Too bad that I'll have to wait up to one year to get my hands on it :/

tzagotta: a Daily Task List is (easily) doable with a custom view: In the customize view dialog click Filter, select the advanced tab and choose Due Date from the field->Frequently-used fields list. Set the condition to today. Dismissing all dialogs with ok will give you the Daily Task List :]
Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:02 PM by Björn Graf

# re: How did we get here?

The ability to colorize tasks by category has to be the greatest thing ever. If you asked what feature I most wanted in Office let alone outlook it would be that.

Thank You!!!
Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:05 AM by Michael

# re: How did we get here?

I've been using Outlook 12 for a week now, and nothing in the world is going to get me to give it up. The new features for managing tasks is absolutely heaven. Marking emails for follow-up on a given day and being able to colorize it is very nice.
Thursday, December 01, 2005 2:37 AM by Trond

# re: How did we get here?

Good job on integrating Outlook with Project!

I'd like to see more attention given to the contact management peice of the software. You folks should pick up the book "Never Eat Alone"; the author talks a lot about maintaining relationships with personal contacts. I would like to see something like the CRM plugin for the rest of us to use in Outlook. There's really no rich way for me to manage relationships with my clients in a "non-sales focused" way (IE: I can't track who I haven't called or email in a month and have outlook remind me about this). The bits and peices are there (Look at Journal), they're just not tied together in a meaningful way.

Also, it would be nice if the notes area in outlook could be replaced with a series of notes that are time stamped. I find myself making notes about my contacts and I have to enter date information to manage my relationship with them.
Thursday, December 01, 2005 1:30 PM by Brad Gessler

# re: How did we get here?

I like OneNote's flagging feature. What makes it so good is that I can flag tasks within a context of memo. I think tasks being visible "in the context" is very important.

Given how I use Outlook daily, and given most of tasks would come from e-mail, I would like to press Ctrl+1 while reading someone's e-mail to create a new task. I would like the task to appear not only in the task pane, but also when I'm writing replies to the e-mail. If the task is done by the reply, I can click the check to mark the task as done.

Well, this might not be ideal, but I hope you get the idea. I like OneNote's way to create, view, and mark tasks, but it works only for a memo I write. I want to do the same thing against incoming e-mails, and I think that's where Outlook's should come in.

One more tiny thing I would like you to keep in mind. I use Outlook tasks as a tiny memo. I know it's not how it was intended, but tasks are the only item I can sync to my Pocket PC. Well, to be precise, memo is also sync'able, but it didn't sync as good as tasks do. Also with WM5 and Exchange SP2, task is now part of server sync, so my usage of tasks as memo would increase. I wish new improvements don't sacrifise that scenario.
Thursday, December 01, 2005 11:44 PM by kojiishi

# re: How did we get here?

Some nice improvements, but it leaves me a little underwhelmed. Task Management in Outlook requires some more basic improvements to enable the type of task management your shooting for (GTD, et al). Specifically missing are:

- a proper "Project" object, to which one should be able to associate taks (and probably contacts, mail messages, etc.); I understand from what I've read that Entourage has some of this; this, to me, is the single biggest shortcoming with Outlook's approach to more robust task management

- some relationships between tasks: order, dependancy (predecessors?)

- possibly some sort of sub-projects and/or sub-tasks
Monday, December 05, 2005 9:01 AM by Dave Hyndman

# re: How did we get here?

I also use a Franklin Covey planner and struggle a little to match the task pads. I don't like the "today" filter because it eliminates past due tasks.

To fix this, one of the things I found in customize views is the custom filter option. I created a new filter on the Due Date field with the criteria "on or before" and the vlaue Today(). This gives me all tasks that are due today or past due, matching what is in my planner.
Wednesday, December 07, 2005 10:33 AM by Beth

# re: How did we get here?

I think that you will like the new To-Do Bar - overdue tasks automatically roll over today so nothing is ever lost.
Friday, December 09, 2005 8:47 PM by mmacbeth

# re: How did we get here?

I agree with David. I think users would greatly benefit from Outlook tasking if there were some way to create relationships between the tasks.

Our team is currently trying out an Outlook task manager called Add2Exchange for Tasks. The application syncs private and public task folders using Exchange. We have a total of 5 members on the team and previously never used Outlook for tasking because there was no ability for real-time collaboration. Add2Exchange allows us to synchronize our private task folders, so the progress/status on each project is kept up-to-date. For example, if I enter data into the notes of task1, Add2Exchange syncs the data with my team members’ private task folders.

We are extremely confident in this product, as we already use Add2Exchange for Calendars and Add2Exchange for Contacts religiously.
Friday, December 16, 2005 11:58 AM by Sarah

# re: How did we get here?

My number 1 issue with Outlook Tasks is the lack of integration. For some reason, Outlook Tasks seem to be treated like "red headed step children". Two prime examples are Sharepoint and Pocket PC. If I take my mobile device in to a hot spot, I can sync my email, calendar, and contacts all via the web. But to sync tasks, I have to hookup to a computer and dock my device. This is way to "klunky" when I really want to just jump into Starbucks and update my tasks.

Sharepoint is the same way...Sharepoint calendar events and contacts can be synched to Outlook but not Tasks. Ideally, we'd put everything in Sharepoint and that would be our system of record for tasks. Then I'd just sync Outlook with Sharepoint and that would give me my mobility. But for some reason, tasks just don't have the same integration that the other Outlook features do.

Just my 2 cents. :)
Monday, December 19, 2005 9:56 AM by John G

# re: How did we get here?

John, I think that you will find that the next version of Windows Mobile (already released), Office 12, and the next version of SharePoint will make you very happy. This release almost feels like it has been dedicated to tasks across the board and better integration.

-Melissa
Tuesday, December 20, 2005 2:54 PM by mmacbeth

# re: How did we get here?

I agree with the other comments about task relationships. This is such a basic concept. I gave up using Outlook tasks because I couldn't make subtasks. Just this one enhancement would greatly improve the usefulness of the product.
Wednesday, December 21, 2005 11:43 AM by Woody

# re: How did we get here?

Until now, I think that people under-utilized the tasks function because this seemed to be the after-thought of the Outlook tools collection. Look at how Outlook presents itself by default. By default the calendar dominates screens where tasks are present. Right now it takes a lot more work to coax user-friendly presentation and use out of tasks than any of the other pieces.

Believe me, what you are saying is right. I feel the need to use tasks and the calendar together effectively. It's just hard to make that a reality. I am pleased to see what you have in store for us and can't wait to get my hands on it!
Wednesday, December 21, 2005 1:39 PM by Brian

# re: How did we get here?

***
Tasks on the Calendar (time-based task management)
***

IMHO, there are new "bells and whistles". There is no real integration between Task and Calendar after 1994.
Wednesday, January 04, 2006 10:48 AM by Vladislav Artukov (359098)

# re: How did we get here?

Great to hear about the improved focus on tasks. I've been using Franklin Covey for Outlook for years for one single feature: it lets you priortize your task list. Please consider including this in Outlook 12 (and Windows Mobile too). Thanks.
Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:52 AM by vagostino

# re: How did we get here?

Put on my wishlist (if not yet available):

1. integartion between tasks in Visual Studio Team System and tasks in Outlook 12, so that they can be synchronized to a mobile for review. Inputting tasks in VSTS is too hard compared to what can be done now using GTD and OL 2003...

2. checkable synchronization options for the mobile: by list, by projects, by status... I want to archive all completed task for a review, but I don't need them all on the mobile device.
(so this adds the need for new properties to the so desired projects/subprojects)

3. separation of the input of a new task from the list of all (filtered) tasks on a mobile device. (Qtek 9100/ Windows Mobile 5). It takes too long before a new simple task/note can be added, because it has to wait too long before the full (or filtered) task list appears and that makes the use of tasks on the mobile almost useless. I want to add ideas/things/tasks when they come up and I don't want to loose them while waiting for the system...

4. integrate well with .net managed code and the time management functionality of OL12... lots of applications do need a kind of task and time management, which can be OL12 of course (why re-invent that specific wheel again)
Monday, January 16, 2006 6:48 PM by Joost Devos

# re: How did we get here?

Huge improvement in Task Management in Office 12 but I aggree strongly with one poster that a "Project" object is crying out for inclusion. I really like this feature in Entourage. Being able to see all data associated with a client is badly needed in Office/Outlook.
Saturday, January 28, 2006 11:10 AM by Ian Moran

# re: How did we get here?

I beleive that this is a step in the right direction. I would like to to see a somewhat automatic approach to scheduling task similar to Taskline. simple plug in your tasks and it fills in where you have time to do them. I believe that and a better sync with mobile, simple project/task hirarchy views will make it a winner.
Thursday, March 30, 2006 11:54 PM by ryan

# re: How did we get here?

Integration of tasks and calendar seem like a great step forward.  Its a technique I was taught more than 20 years ago and have missed ever since the Calendar on X-Windows on VAX/VMS.  That said, will the new integration have the capability to mark tasks complete directly out of the calendar?  That seems like a must.  ALso, like the Franklin Planner, we need deeper prioritization other than High-Meduim-Low.  Something like Frankin's A1-x, B1-x, C1-x are needed to organize tasks.  Otherwise, everything becomes high priority.
Thursday, May 11, 2006 3:17 PM by Bob Withers

# re: How did we get here?

You need a way of undertanding both contexts and project.  The existing "category" system is not flexible to handle this.  I'm surprised you didn't get this from your research, it is a central tenant of modern productivity systems.

Example: I need to do task 1 on the phone, and task 2 on the net.  They are both a part of a project called "research".  I need to do task 3 on the phone and task 4 on the net.  They are both a part of a project called "press release".  Now I'm on my laptop, with my cell phone and no net connection with 30 minutes before my plane boards.  How do I get a simple list of things I can do on the phone (tasks 1 and 3) instead of a list of tasks by project?

I hope Outlook 2007 addresses this
Monday, May 15, 2006 2:31 PM by Karl Whealton

# Black Belt Productivity » The Evil Empire is Listening

# re: How did we get here?

You have a single field called Priority... there should be 2 fields:
- Relevance (Important, Not Important)
- Urgency (Urgent, Routine)

And allow to sort by both criteria simultaneously.

Basic time management policy:
IU --> Focus in that do it now
IR --> Focus on that next
NU --> Delegate now to your assistant
NR --> Delegate later (or forget it ;-) )
Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:17 PM by Juan Carlos

# re: How did we get here?

Seems like Sharepoint and Outlook integration as a whole was an afterthought, or purposefully crippled so as to have people wanting more features. I mean how could you NOT integrate all Outlook options into Sharepoint and vice-versa. Even the items that ARE integrated are done so very poorly.
Monday, July 24, 2006 2:10 PM by Jeff A

# re: How did we get here?

Sunday, August 20, 2006 10:10 PM by task management software

# re: How did we get here?

uhmm.. .because it comes up to a blank page...

that would be a reason I guess not to use it.

What do you think?

Friday, August 17, 2007 5:58 PM by Mags

Leave a Comment

(required) 
required 
(required) 
 
Page view tracker