<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The test cases go marching two by two, hurrah, hurrah</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/micahel/archive/2004/04/28/122702.aspx</link><description>One of the banes of my existence is test matrices. Everywhere I look, it seems, another matrix is lurking, impatiently waiting to lob another set of mind-numbinginly boring test cases at me that are guaranteed to suck up two more weeks' worth of the extra</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Pairwise Test Matrices</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/micahel/archive/2004/04/28/122702.aspx#123377</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 01:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:123377</guid><dc:creator>Software Test Engineering @ Microsoft</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: The test cases go marching two by two, hurrah, hurrah</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/micahel/archive/2004/04/28/122702.aspx#123591</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:123591</guid><dc:creator>sstearns</dc:creator><description>You forgot to add Windows XP SP2 and Windows Server 2003 SP1 to the matrix.  :)</description></item><item><title>Pairwise Testing for Dummies</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/micahel/archive/2004/04/28/122702.aspx#158897</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 06:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:158897</guid><dc:creator>davfries's WebLog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Pairwise Testing for Dummies</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/micahel/archive/2004/04/28/122702.aspx#158901</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 06:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:158901</guid><dc:creator>davfries's WebLog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Pairwise Testing for Dummies</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/micahel/archive/2004/04/28/122702.aspx#172131</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2004 01:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:172131</guid><dc:creator>davfries's WebLog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: Don't do this restrictions</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/micahel/archive/2004/04/28/122702.aspx#203121</link><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2004 19:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:203121</guid><dc:creator>Bob Jenkins</dc:creator><description>jenny and aetg support &amp;quot;Don't do this&amp;quot; restrictions.  Allpairs does not.  I don't know one way or the other for the java application or precalculated matrices you point at. &lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Yes Virginia, Developers Really *Can* Test</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/micahel/archive/2004/04/28/122702.aspx#226877</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 19:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:226877</guid><dc:creator>The Braidy Tester</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Testing For Developers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/micahel/archive/2004/04/28/122702.aspx#542688</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 07:27:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:542688</guid><dc:creator>The Braidy Tester</dc:creator><description>When we testers find yet another &amp;amp;quot;Did you even run this?&amp;amp;quot; bug, it's easy to believe developers purposely...</description></item><item><title>Criss-Cross</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/micahel/archive/2004/04/28/122702.aspx#542698</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 07:32:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:542698</guid><dc:creator>The Braidy Tester</dc:creator><description>One of the areas I'm focusing on these days is cross-feature testing - purposely taking a wide-and-shallow...</description></item><item><title>?????????? ?????????? (All-Pair Testing)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/micahel/archive/2004/04/28/122702.aspx#3657740</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:54:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3657740</guid><dc:creator>?????????? ?????????? (All-Pair Testing)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.advancedqtp.co.il/2007/07/all-pair-testing/"&gt;http://www.advancedqtp.co.il/2007/07/all-pair-testing/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>All Pair testing</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/micahel/archive/2004/04/28/122702.aspx#3657842</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 12:03:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3657842</guid><dc:creator>All Pair testing</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.advancedqtp.com/2007/07/all-pair-testing/"&gt;http://www.advancedqtp.com/2007/07/all-pair-testing/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>