<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>We broke CharNext/CharPrev (or, bugs found through blogging?)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/01/30/363420.aspx</link><description>(special thanks to James for pointing out this bug) It is amazing how sometimes one can be so busy trying to make a point that one can miss the point. A few days ago, I pointed out that CharNext(ch) != ch+1, a lot of the time . That ought to be true.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: We broke CharNext/CharPrev (or, bugs found through blogging?)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/01/30/363420.aspx#363425</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:363425</guid><dc:creator>James</dc:creator><description>Thanks for investigating and sorry it took time from your weekend. I'm also glad you're going to keep blogging - it's a great read!</description></item><item><title>re: We broke CharNext/CharPrev (or, bugs found through blogging?)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/01/30/363420.aspx#363427</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:363427</guid><dc:creator>Michael Kaplan</dc:creator><description>No apology needed -- it is a great find, and you were an important step to finding it. Feel free to read and question any time!</description></item><item><title>re: We broke CharNext/CharPrev (or, bugs found through blogging?)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/01/30/363420.aspx#363519</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 02:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:363519</guid><dc:creator>Ken Smith</dc:creator><description>Any chance if a fix for downlevel platforms? :-)</description></item><item><title>re: We broke CharNext/CharPrev (or, bugs found through blogging?)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/01/30/363420.aspx#363523</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 03:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:363523</guid><dc:creator>Michael Kaplan</dc:creator><description>Ken -- I honestly don't know, but I'll probably ask.</description></item><item><title>re: We broke CharNext/CharPrev (or, bugs found through blogging?)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/01/30/363420.aspx#363528</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 03:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:363528</guid><dc:creator>BillG would call me Communist</dc:creator><description>Yes, how wonderful is open collaboration, it's rather incredible how much better it makes a development process! How much more wonderful still would be freedom of code! &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Of course, this is why Free Software will inevitably triumph - possibly not organically, but rather by converting unbelievers like yourself, however grudgingly. Here you show yourself taking the first baby steps, and if it were not for your salary clouding your judgements your steps would be quicker and heartier still.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Guess what - Free Software is generally far more localis/zed and internationalis/zed and even globalis/zed than your own patheticly Anglocentric offerings. This is as a direct result of the freedom - because of the sense of ownership and community and collaboration that can only come from the trust encircled with code.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;You are obviously an exceptionally talented man leading an exceptionally talented men and women, probably the best internationalis/zation individuals in the world. It must hurt terribly to be outflanked despite this. Perhaps you should reflect on the reasons why, and start embracing and engaging all those who care at a deeper level.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Finally, some humo/ur related to internationalis/zation:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Russia Donates Cyrillic Characters To Alleviate Acronym Shortage&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a target=&amp;quot;_new&amp;quot; href=&amp;quot;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://humorix.org/articles/2005/01/acronym-crisis/&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://humorix.org/articles/2005/01/acronym-crisis/&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;"&gt;http://humorix.org/articles/2005/01/acronym-crisis/&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://humorix.org/articles/2005/01/acronym-crisis/&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Where did the new StringInfo stuff come from?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/01/30/363420.aspx#413369</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:48:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:413369</guid><dc:creator>Sorting It All Out</dc:creator><description>I used it in a very confusing and obfuscated way in Normalization as obfuscation in C#. And then yesterday...</description></item><item><title>Here is an interview question for you. :-)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/01/30/363420.aspx#465230</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:32:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:465230</guid><dc:creator>Sorting It All Out</dc:creator><description>I am not doing interviews at the moment, but I could actually see using this one (another question will...</description></item><item><title>Things I [don't] like about blogging</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/01/30/363420.aspx#643463</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 03:05:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:643463</guid><dc:creator>Sorting It All Out</dc:creator><description>There are many things I like about blogging. &lt;br&gt;There are bugs that have been found specifically through...</description></item><item><title>'A' and 'W' are sometimes living in two different worlds</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/01/30/363420.aspx#668816</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:10:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:668816</guid><dc:creator>Sorting It All Out</dc:creator><description>When you think about the 'A' and 'W' decorated versions of functions, in most cases the 'A' version is...</description></item><item><title>Some people feel really insecure about the size of their [string] members</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/01/30/363420.aspx#1053929</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:05:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1053929</guid><dc:creator>Sorting It All Out</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Developer Andrew Arnott asks: Michael, David Kline recommended I forward my question on to you. If you&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>What('s) a character!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/01/30/363420.aspx#1416860</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:00:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1416860</guid><dc:creator>The Old New Thing</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It depends on context.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: We broke CharNext/CharPrev (or, bugs found through blogging?)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/01/30/363420.aspx#9229148</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:41:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9229148</guid><dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So why does &amp;#252; (U+00FC) return C3_NONSPACING? &amp;nbsp;What does this flag mean if non-spacing characters (U+0308) don't have it, and characters which flow as normal do?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: We broke CharNext/CharPrev (or, bugs found through blogging?)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/01/30/363420.aspx#9230195</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9230195</guid><dc:creator>Michael S. Kaplan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, in Vista it returns C3_ALPHA | C3_DIACRITIC | C3_NONSPACING since it is a letter with a diacritic included in it....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U+0308 has C3_DIACRITIC | C3_NONSPACING there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What full results are you seeing, and on what platform?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>UCS-2 to UTF-16, Part 10: Variation[ Selector] on a theme...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/01/30/363420.aspx#9724313</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:41:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9724313</guid><dc:creator>Sorting it all Out</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Previous blogs in this series of blogs on this Blog: Part 0: The intro, sans content Part 1: Getting&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>