<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Normalize Wide Shut</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2007/08/17/4424917.aspx</link><description>(Apologies to Stanley Kubrick, of course!) It was almost the very first blog post I ever wrote, back in end of November 2004, entitled Normalization and Microsoft -- whats the story? In it I mentioned that during my time at Microsoft I really had heard</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Normalize Wide Shut</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2007/08/17/4424917.aspx#4429746</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:30:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4429746</guid><dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; is wishful thinking when it isn't applied to a minimal universal representation for the data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Normalize&amp;quot; just sounds more impressive that &amp;quot;cleanup&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;make valid.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Normalize Wide Shut</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2007/08/17/4424917.aspx#4430668</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:38:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4430668</guid><dc:creator>Michael S. Kaplan</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;I suppose we should be grateful and say hosanahs that they did not use&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Disambiguate&lt;/STRONG&gt; in the title? :-)&lt;/P&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>