Invariant vs. Ordinal, the thirdhttp://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2006/05/24/605599.aspxMike Sheldon is one of the smartest guys I know. You may have seen him on Channel 9 talking about Windows Shell Architecture with fellow architect Chris Guzak. And at least two people divined that he was the 'Mike' I credited in this post for his helpen-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)Interesting Finds: May 24, 2006 AM edition http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2006/05/24/605599.aspx#605984Wed, 24 May 2006 17:16:53 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:605984TrackBackSomething .NET does more intuitively than Windowshttp://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2006/05/24/605599.aspx#702168Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:14:01 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:702168Sorting It All Out <br>Back when I wrote Invariant vs. Ordinal, the third, two of the interesting points I made were that,...Something .NET does less intuitively than they oughthttp://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2006/05/24/605599.aspx#3019661Fri, 01 Jun 2007 09:59:45 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3019661Sorting It All Out<p>If you are someone who reads the BCL Team blog, you may have seen Josh Free's String.Compare() != String.Equals()</p> That function is always faster! (well, except for that one case when it can actually be slower...)http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2006/05/24/605599.aspx#5422930Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:16:25 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5422930Sorting It All Out<p>Warning : this post discusses an undocumented side effect of the shipping implementation of a few functions</p>