<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Is SQL2000 more clever than SQL2005?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/microsoft_dynamics_nav_sustained_engineering/archive/2007/09/20/is-sql2000-more-clever-than-sql2005.aspx</link><description>I have seen a number of (good) arguments that some issues with Dynamics NAV on SQL2005 are caused by a bad query optimizer in SQL2005, and that the SQL teams need to fix this. After all, some issues we see on SQL2005 did not exist in SQL2000. This blog</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>MSDN Blog Postings  &amp;raquo; Is SQL2000 more clever than SQL2005?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/microsoft_dynamics_nav_sustained_engineering/archive/2007/09/20/is-sql2000-more-clever-than-sql2005.aspx#5012950</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:48:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5012950</guid><dc:creator>MSDN Blog Postings  » Is SQL2000 more clever than SQL2005?</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2007/09/20/is-sql2000-more-clever-than-sql2005/"&gt;http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2007/09/20/is-sql2000-more-clever-than-sql2005/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>