Welcome to MSDN Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

Microsoft Word 2010

The official blog of the Microsoft Word product team
Introducing Word 2010!

We've been patiently waiting to talk with you about what we've been working on for the last two years, and the wait is over. Today we'll introduce Word 2010 at a very high-level, and then dig deeper and deeper into specific topics and features in the coming months.

Of course, please let us know what you want to hear about.

Word 2010 from 30,000 Feet

The way we work with documents has changed dramatically. In the past, individuals worked on relatively simple, local documents, from their office. Today, it is common for groups to work on rich, shared documents, from anywhere.

Given this shift, we've focused Word 2010 on dramatically improving document collaboration, graphics, and navigation…and then taking the richness and familiarity of Word, and putting it into the browser and onto the mobile phone.

Dramatically Improved Collaboration, Graphics, and Navigation

    • Simultaneous editing of Word documents -- all the richness of Word with multiple people at the same time. Say goodbye to this dialog:

      With Word 2010, you can co-author right within Word. You don't need to hassle with email attachments, or documents with names like TSP_final_2_reallyFinal_FINAL.docx. Instead, just open your document, and start co-authoring. You can see who else is working with you, and where they are editing.

       

      • Automatic offline editing and sync'ing of shared documents  -- when you open a shared document, Word automatically caches it so that you can edit it offline, and then Word will automatically sync your changes when you come back online. So if you need to work away from the office, you will no longer need to worry about saving local copies or manually merging your changes into the server document when you get back to your office. Word 2010 takes care of all of that for you.
      • All sorts of new graphical goodness  -- artistic picture effects and easy picture editing, more SmartArt diagrams, and rich graphical and typographic effects on text.

        Note how "pear" and "shooze" are squiggled. That's because they are just really rich text in the document, not a picture, WordArt, or any other object.

        • A new navigation pane and search experience -- easily reorganize your document via drag and drop, and find stuff quickly with incremental search. You can stop copying and pasting huge sections of your document, quickly find your way around long documents, and you don't need to know exactly what you are searching for to find it.

           

          Word in Your Browser and on Your Phone

          The other big piece of Word 2010 is giving you the power and familiarity of Word everywhere you need it. In short, you will be able to view, navigate, and edit your Word documents from the browser and from your mobile phone without compromising your document's richness.

          I know that was really high-level, but hopefully you have a sense for how Word 2010 will dramatically improve how and where you work on documents.

          We'd love to hear your initial thoughts, and what you'd like to hear more about.

           - Jonathan Bailor

            PS Here's some fun Word 2010 videos of note:

             

            Posted: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:59 AM by wrdblog
            Filed under: ,

            Comments

            Beth Melton said:

            Can you tell me if the collaboration feature is limited to those using SharePoint? IOW, for those of us lowly Word users who don't have SharePoint running in our living rooms, will we still be able to take advantage of the improved collaboration features?

            Thanks!

            # July 14, 2009 10:41 PM

            nobody said:

            New features are great and I like to see the File in use dialog gone, so I hope you'll be clearly notified you are coediting.

            But what is more important than new features - how many of the bugs still present in Office 2007 will be fixed at least in Office 2010,

            better already in Office 2007?

            Because there are way too many. Office 2007 SP2 included almost no fixes for Word 2007 compared to Excel or Outlook, though IMHO it's still very buggy and MS knows those bugs.

            Please slow down introducing new features and put more resources into fixing up things or Word will become feature-overloaded but buggy as hell.

            # July 15, 2009 3:15 AM

            sevenflavor said:

            Simultaneous co-editing would been so useful if you allow consumers to sign in with a Windows Live ID like Windows Live Messenger instead of SharePoint which makes the feature useful only to enterprise users. Similarly in case of automatic offline editing and sync'ing of shared documents, does this feature work for consumers with Office Web Apps/Office Live? That makes it 2 less for consumers. Can you elaborate on how these two work? Is SharePoint required?

            # July 15, 2009 3:39 AM

            Greg said:

            The biggest problem I face when I'm contributing to a document from multiple collaborators is dealing with the issue of text flow.

            Although avoiding "typewriter formatting" and using predefined styles are the answers to many or most of the text flow problems, almost nobody that I work with has a clue about any of these things or is willing to learn.

            When Word's UI openly invites users to screw up text flow by, for example, encouraging inserting a hard page break rather than setting a "Page Break Before" paragraph property, it's hardly surprising that most multi-author documents require more time for editing than they do for content. And some features are simply still not available in Word, despite having been requested for years - such as the ability to set space before and after tables, or the ability to anchor a table to the top or bottom of a page.

            Another feature I see seriously lacking is the ability to "lock" the pagination of a document, regardless of printer or paper size (A4 vs US Letter), and without exporting to PDF/XPS. I've wasted who knows how much time in teleconferences because the printed version of the document is paginated differently for each of the attendees, and noone can find the particular section under discussion.

            Like a previous commentor, it looks to me like Word 2010 will be like 2007: adding a lot of features of which some are beneficial and some are of dubious benefit, but still failing to address problems in the software that have existed since at least the 97 version.

            Oh, and why you're at it, make the ribbon customizable and dockable to the side of the screen. Then I might actually want to use it.

            # July 15, 2009 5:02 AM

            mb2gman said:

            How would this multi-collaboration work with a HR document, that say and emoployee and his line manager are both reviewing at the same time, then conduction an annual HR appraisal?  My difficulty is that we embed these word documents into our HR software database directly.  Sounds like a lot of work to get this working correctly.

            # July 15, 2009 7:17 AM

            pauldg said:

            I have to read a lot of official MS documents, like the Product List and the Product Use Rights document, and they use completely random and illogical styles. It's impossible to navigate them in outline mode, because stuff that should be heading 1 is Normal made to look like heading 1, for example. It has to be a huge amount of work to manually format everything to maintain the proper bullets, numbering, bolding, fonts, etc. in these docs without styles. You'd think that on 100-page docs that get updated every quarter (the PUR) or every month (the product list), MS would use styles.

            # July 15, 2009 2:03 PM

            pauldg said:

            I use comments all the time, doing a lot of editing. Word 2000 handled both comments and revision tracking perfectly. Word 2002 (XP) broke it very badly. I couldn't see tracked deletions and additions as before (the balloons are of little use to me and actually make it harder to read a doc with comments from several authors). The delete key and the backspace key never worked properly (oddly, the backspace key could delete back, but not selected text. The delete key could delete selected text, but not the next character. This was logged in a kb article in 2001, and has not been fixed in any successive version of Word. For me, it's a showstopper. I still use Word 2000; I've given up on successive versions of Word for editing and commenting. I'm hoping that OpenOffice will reach reasonable parity with Word 2K by this fall (macro key assignments are my main blocker there, right now); I already use OO Impress as my PowerPoint editor, since it actually obeys its templates, something that MS PPT refuses to do way too often.

            # July 15, 2009 2:11 PM

            quikboy1001@hotmail.com said:

            So has WordArt improved at all? Or does it still look like it's been stuck in the 90's? :^)

            I really don't recall many if any problems with Word 2007. It's nice to see the Office team has added some more features. I don't know about the other commentors, but I hope their beef with Word is considered.

            I think it would be really neat if Word could support tabbed documents, where a user could view/work on a document in one tab, and click another tab to view/work on a different document. Enhance it, by allowing thumbnail hovers over the the tabs, a feature like QuickTabs from IE8, etc.

            It would also be great to have some more Word themes, beyond Blue, Silver, and Black.

            Keep up the good work.

            # July 15, 2009 4:00 PM

            wrdblog said:

            Hi Beth, sevenflavor, mb2gman - Great questions about how/where co-authoring will be supported. In short, we’re working hard to enable as many Word 2010 users as possible to easily leverage co-authoring, and will have more specifics posted as soon as we can.

            - Jonathan Bailor (MS)

            # July 15, 2009 4:06 PM

            wrdblog said:

            Hi quikboy1001 – RE: WordArt - The “graphical goodness” that I mentioned in the post is like WordArt x10. We’ll blog about this in much more detail in the future, but for now know that you’ll be able to apply rich effects such as shadows, reflections, glows, bevels, outlines, etc directly to text in Word 2010. This means you’ll have more richness than WordArt, plus be able to manipulate the rich text just like any other text in your document.

            - Jonathan Bailor (MS)

            # July 15, 2009 4:12 PM

            Brian said:

            Any further development of the (somewhat rudimentary) citation/bibliography capabilities of Word 2007?

            # July 16, 2009 6:54 AM

            philcrisp said:

            Heartily agree with Greg and nobody.  Notice that you haven't commented on that  Bullets and numbering's been possessed since 1994 and it ain't fixed yet.  Word still does that thing with text copied from another document where it ends up with a style/format that was present in neither document, just like it did in 1994.  Sorted any of that?

            # July 17, 2009 10:52 AM

            wrdblog said:

            philcrisp, Greg and "nobody": First, I hope you can spend some time w/the blog posts team members have written in an attempt to demystify bullets and numbering: http://blogs.msdn.com/microsoft_office_word/archive/tags/bullets+and+numbering/default.aspx

            Second, an important part of every product cycle is fixing existing bugs and fractured-scenarios in the product. We take this super seriously. We look forward to your feedback (in this regard) once you've had a chance to get hands-on w/Word 2010!

            FWIW, We'll have a blog post up in the next few days talking about how we framed the release in a bit more detail.

            Scott Stiles, Group Program Manager, Word.

            # July 17, 2009 2:42 PM

            Steven said:

            Does Word  and Powerpoint 2010 crash using HP C7280 like in 2007 before the HP driver fix?

            # July 17, 2009 3:01 PM

            Yves said:

            @Brian:

            I got my hands on a computer with the preview installed (I don't have it myself) and from the little time I had to play with it, it seems there are no changes at all when it comes to the citations and bibliography tools.

            @Microsoft:

            Word 2008 for Mac has (limited) support for footnote citations. Why isn't the same (or better) functionality available in Word 2010 TP?

            Word 2007 and 2008 both have a bug when it comes to the storage of author names in sources entries. Is there any reason why this simple XSLT bug was not fixed in Word 2010 TP? (http://bibword.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=27834)

            Maybe a bit harsh, but is there actually any group/person inside the Word team who looked at the citation and bibliography features at all?

            # July 18, 2009 1:01 PM

            Brian said:

            Sparkly drop-caps that spin around like a disco ball?  We're on that!  After all, the secretaries need some kind of amusement between checking out the latest LOLcats and forwarding that hilarious email that everybody will love.

            Real tools for real writers?  Not so much.

            # July 18, 2009 5:09 PM

            someone said:

            I'd like to see a more standards-compliant HTML renderer in Word or Office in general but I think it's too late now (technical preview stage) and Microsoft complains about fidelity loss. I copy lots of content from web pages into Word as the browser doesn't give me flexible enough printing and page layout options. However with Word's layout engine, most of the page appears totally different and broken. I know there are WYSIWYG HTML editors but for quickly editing and printing, Word is easier, so I wish Microsoft really made the engine fully standards compliant (at least better CSS and full HTML 4.01/XHTML 1.0 support for editing and save as, not just blog publish? so we don't need tools like these: http://textism.com/wordcleaner/)

            @pauldg, I think you can reinstate the old track changes box using Tools => Customize and also change the behavior to use strikeouts instead of balloons like pre-Word 2002.

            # July 19, 2009 12:23 PM

            anonymuos said:

            Please put live preview (ligatures etc too) in the Font dialog box/increase the size of the preview box in the dialog so it's visible at larger font sizes.

            # July 19, 2009 4:36 PM

            wrdblog said:

            Hi Yves,

            Yes, we're tracking the issues you note in your comment above, and hope to address them (along with a set of other related issues we've already addressed) in Word 2010. Thanks for the link.

            Given your expertise in the area, we'd be interested in connecting w/you offline to hear more feedback about the feature. Would you be able to post contact info on your codeplex site?

            Scott Stiles (MS)

            # July 20, 2009 1:28 PM

            wrdblog said:

            Hi Brian – Unfortunately we didn’t bring marching ants back :)

            On a more serious note, what “real tools for real writers” are you hoping for? Also, what type of “real authoring” do you focus on?

             - Jonathan Bailor (MS)

            # July 20, 2009 1:34 PM

            Brian said:

            In my case, academic writing.

            For starters,

            How about getting master documents right?  Even if it means starting over from the beginning.  Just do it...it'll make you feel good inside.

            Also, how about a document format that we can trust won't go obsolete and that we can retrieve our data/writing from if need be?  Doing something based on XML had such potential...but...A 9,000 PAGE FORMAT SPECIFICAITION??  WTF?? OK, I know what that's about...a juvenile attempt to befuddle your competitors.  News flash: they aren't the ones keeping you in doggie biscuits.

            And as for the citation/bibliography thing: to quote a great wise-man: "Do, or do not.  There is no try."  If you couldn't get it right in-house, then just use some of your pocket change and buy EndNote.  A half-assed version is worse than useless.

            # July 20, 2009 6:26 PM

            Dave38 said:

            I specifically joined this blog to say to the Microsoft Word team that numbering on Word 2007 is the worst piece of garbage ever invented which just doesn't work.  How on earth do you get it to renumber properly. You have had 10 years to fix it!

            # July 20, 2009 10:31 PM

            Stuart (Word PM) said:

            Could we get more details about what is broken around your experience with lists (whether numbering or bullets)? I am the PM who worked on lists in 2007 and am so sorry to hear that we haven't fixed the problems that are plaguing you -- we made a lot of changes to address the problems we knew about but I hear your frustration and know that means there's more for us to do. Can you educate us further about what you're seeing? I'm not as involved in this area this release but I know that those who are will be listening as well. Thank you so much for your feedback and help in helping us improve our product.

            -Stuart

            # July 21, 2009 11:33 AM

            Yves said:

            @Scott Stiles

            Feel free to contact me either through my CodePlex profile or directly by email. You can find my email at the top of (almost) every XSL file you can download from my CodePlex site.

            Yves

            # July 22, 2009 4:11 AM

            philcrisp said:

            Stuart,  as soon as I have time I will give you plenty of feedback.  However I am currently engaged in revising a 70 page policy document and this task is being very considerably impeded by persistant issues with the numbering.  And before you ask, I've tried everything recommemed by the help function over the years and none of it helped.  If I had kept a swear box specifically for swearing prompted by bullets and numbering since I started using Word in 1994, the charity of your choice would be considerably richer.  I sincerely hope that you have addressed the myriad issues in this area with the latest release.  If you weren't aware of them, which alternate universe have you been visiting?

            # July 24, 2009 5:20 AM

            Michael Mueller said:

            CMYK

            since 10 years I am waiting for CMYK support in Word, just ad to RGB / HSL drop down menu CMYK, It would be a very quick task for your team. Word for the Macintosh has the CMYK choice for more than a decade.

            I have a lot of troubles to change the RGB values in the PDF document with Pitstop to get things right before I send the files to the printer shop.

            You did a great job adding full Open Type support to Word 2010!!

            # July 25, 2009 11:02 AM

            wrdblog said:

            Hi Michael Mueller - Thanks for the excellent feedback. In the meantime, have you tried using Microsoft Publisher? Publisher supports CMYK and Pantone color models.

            - Jonathan Bailor(MS)

            # July 28, 2009 5:27 PM

            Francis said:

            I very much like the changes in Word 2010 (except Backstage, which has blown all my muscle-memory keyboard shortcuts out of the water and is disorienting.)

            Still, I have a couple of questions:

            1. What's happening with the new text boxes? I take it they're DrawingML replacements for 2007's VML, but they do not work properly with fields, especially TOCs and cross-references. This really needs to be fixed by shipping time. Ideally, the text boxes would be as transparent as frames are to fields.

            2. Do features like Drop Caps still use frames, or have they migrated to the new, much more powerful text boxes?

            3. Is there any way you could add hex color support to Office? It drives me mad converting colors back and forth for the web. All you'd need is a Hex option along RGB and HSL (the values'd still be stored as RGB.)

            4. Borders and Shading hasn't been changed. I'd love to see Borders and Shading that have been upgraded to match the new text boxes & effects. Perhaps Borders and Shading could be phased out and replaced with more powerful (the ability to control character vs. paragraph) text effects?

            5. Why isn't kerning on by default?

            6. Not a question, but I'd love to see a more intuitive section interface in the next version.

            Thanks!

            # July 29, 2009 9:07 PM

            Bob said:

            Hi

            in office 2003 it was simple to add a picture from scanner to doc you were working by clicking "insert"and highlighting scanner and was made live simple but newer virsions this was dropped and it made more work and unnesserary files you dint need. this was dropped in 2007. Is this facility being returned to office 2010

            # August 1, 2009 12:32 PM

            Stuart (Word PM) said:

            Francis -

            1) The new textboxes are built on architecture similar to that used for the old textboxes (where they contain text, not the paragraph formatting model of frames. But many of the issues that you've identified are ones we are working to fix.

            2) Drop Caps still use frames. We're looking at improvements in that are in a future release.

            3) This is outside my area of knowledge. We tend to use standardized units but that doesn't seem like that would preclude hex numeric values.

            4) Curious as to what you mean by something that can control character versus paragraph text effects. Have you looked into the style model of Word? As to improving borders, also something we hope to address in a future release.

            5) Something we're considering for this release. Factors are performance for long documents and whether there is noticeable improvement for the typical user (particularly with the default fonts).

            6) Me too!

            -Stuart

            # August 6, 2009 10:23 AM

            Wes said:

            Why are the screeshots hosted at another site (http://stunna42.members.winisp.net)?  Please host them on technet or msdn.  I just see a bunch of red x's.  The blog is not nearly as interesting without the screenshots.

            Thanks.

            # August 10, 2009 1:32 PM

            wrdblog said:

            Wes - Are you still seeing this? I think we just had a bit of a server issue over the weekend.

            - Jonathan Bailor (MS)

            # August 10, 2009 3:19 PM

            Training Connection said:

            Editing a word or PowerPoint file on a smartphone seems like a great idea but so much has changed given the ribbon. Possibly, we would then require an entirely new way to navigate its functions again. I'm all for it yet this may make us want bigger smart phones. I think the iPhone is as big as it should get. I think we work too much. How about we save it for proper size screens...

            # August 18, 2009 5:54 PM

            PeteB said:

            Master Documents and Numbering need to be fixed in Word 2010.  There is so much information out there that highlights the failures of these 2 "features".

            # August 25, 2009 12:12 PM

            Jim Hanson said:

            question 1: in word 2003 and 2007, when you save as a web page, it degrades photos pretty significantly. the only way to avoid this is to use web options with vml. when you do that--the pictures won't show in firefox. is word 2010 doing something to deal with this? (for example, giving us the option to save the graphics in web pages as is, with no compression)?

            question 2: mail merge. can word 2010 sql mail merge handle long amounts of text? currently it cuts off text frequently at 256 characters (or something like that). very frustrating.

            question 3: mail merge of avery 5160 labels. can't get them to work in word 2007. some weird error.

            comment: i LOVE the customization of the ribbons, i LOVE that you can drag and drop large sections of the document (i've been waiting for that for 12 years now), and i LOVE the new editing at same time as others feature. very nice.

            # September 4, 2009 4:30 AM

            Jim said:

            I think they need to make it easier to manage document versions in word.

            Am I the only one who ALWAYS creates a new file each time I save my document, by using Save As - i.e. filename v1.docx, filename v2.docx and so on up to filename v48.docx.

            The reason I do this is because it's way too easy to over-write stuff if you use the 'Save' function in word, and then later regret it.  Also I still have memories of document corruption - editing one bit and saving the file, only to find out it totally messed up something elsewhere like the page formatting and I can't roll back.

            And here's one MEGA REQUEST PLEASE........

            BIG BIG REQUEST......

            PLEASE put something in Word so that when people like me, who have grown immune to the constant 'are you sure?' type prompts, accidentally do "Alt... F... C... Y" to close a document (this usually happens when I have numerous documents open, some of which I have edited but don't want to save the changes on because I have just been using them as a sort of editing workspace) and then think "Oh $'£&*!!!" because I just shut down my main file I have been working on and didn't save the changes, despite the "do you want to save changes" prompt, don't lose all our work.  This is REALLY annoying.  It is way too easy to close a file and automatically press "Y" without thinking, then to realise you have lost your work.  Isn't there a way Word can just keep an temporary archive of the 10 last files or so you have closed down, in the state they were in when word closed, just in case you made a mistake and exited without saving the doc?  Autosave doesn't do this.

            # September 4, 2009 12:41 PM

            wrdblog said:

            Hi Jim –

            Re: Versioning: Have you tried saving your documents to Office Live Workspaces? That way you’ll get server side versioning. Check-out a demo at: http://ask.officelive.com/workspace/media/p/180.aspx

            Re: big big request: Please keep an eye on the Office 2010 Engineering blog at http://blogs.technet.com/office2010/ … in the near future they’ll announce something that I think you’ll like.

            - Jonathan Bailor (MS)

            # September 4, 2009 3:45 PM
            New Comments to this post are disabled
            Page view tracker