FrontPage RPCs are Here To Stay, Too

re: FrontPage RPCs are Here To Stay, Too

masa — Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:08:00 GMT

I just finished writing a .NET wrapper class around FPRPC and if anybody is interested in doing beta testing around it - send e-mail to masa[at]grapecity.com

thanks,

re: FrontPage RPCs are Here To Stay, Too

Paul van Brenk — Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:48:00 GMT

"SOAP can’t chunk"

isn't that exactly the reason W3C added MTOM to the soapspec, so it would be able to efficiently send large binary files.

http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-soap12-mtom-20050125/

Sharepoint v3 "facts"

Mart Muller's Sharepoint Weblog — Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:47:00 GMT

re: FrontPage RPCs are Here To Stay, Too

Ray Olsons — Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:18:00 GMT

Does FrontPage RPC work for posting large size documents? I'm trying to use "put document" method but I keep getting HTTP timeout errors for anything over ~100K.

Want a Good Example of FPRPC? Try SharePad!

FitzBlog — Mon, 30 May 2005 23:38:51 GMT

I haven&rsquo;t blogged for a while, but I&rsquo;m hoping to make up for it &mdash; starting with this&hellip;...

re: FrontPage RPCs are Here To Stay, Too

Exolit — Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:57:56 GMT

FP RPC is good but is it possible to update document property without make new version of document. Or how to use FPRPC in event handler on wss document library because after update of document, application pool become author of document.

re: FrontPage RPCs are Here To Stay, Too

Gilles Kern — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:45:37 GMT

Hi there,
got strange thing while using RPC on SPS servers for deleting a file (I'm using the remove documents method) I receive the following error message:

<html><head><title>vermeer RPC packet</title></head>
<body>
method=remove documents:6.0.2.6356
status=12
msg=THIS IS MESSAGE FROM GOOD
message=failed to remove documents
removed_docs=
<ul>
</ul>
removed_dirs=
<ul>
</ul>
failed_docs=
<ul>
</ul>
failed_dirs=
<ul>
</ul>
</body>
</html>

Have you an idea about what is this message about?
Is there apackage that does RPC out of the box?
Thx

Timeout solved

pjotr — Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:33:13 GMT

If you wan't a larger timeout value you can set this on the request. That's helpfull for uploading large files via VPN or slow connections:

In FrontPageRPC.cs on line 359 (in my version):

HttpWebRequest req = StartWebRequest(GetAuthorURL(webUrl.SiteUrl), methodData);
System.IO.Stream reqStream = req.GetRequestStream();
// timout edit: make it half an hour max instead of the default 100 seconds
req.Timeout = 1800000;

SharePoint 2007 : une méthode rapide pour tout récupérer en XML

The Mit's Blog — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:19:37 GMT

Un petit post en réponse à une question que j'ai vu sur le newsgroup français de SharePoint. En résumé,

FitzBlog FrontPage RPCs are Here To Stay Too | Wood TV Stand

FitzBlog FrontPage RPCs are Here To Stay Too | Wood TV Stand — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:28:32 GMT

PingBack from http://woodtvstand.info/story.php?id=56412

FitzBlog FrontPage RPCs are Here To Stay Too | unemployment office

FitzBlog FrontPage RPCs are Here To Stay Too | unemployment office — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:31:38 GMT

PingBack from http://unemploymentofficeresource.info/story.php?id=7421

FitzBlog FrontPage RPCs are Here To Stay Too | patio umbrella

FitzBlog FrontPage RPCs are Here To Stay Too | patio umbrella — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:11:24 GMT

PingBack from http://patioumbrellasource.info/story.php?id=180

FitzBlog FrontPage RPCs are Here To Stay Too | pool toys

FitzBlog FrontPage RPCs are Here To Stay Too | pool toys — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:32:30 GMT

PingBack from http://pooltoysite.info/story.php?id=6207