Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

Informazioni importanti sulla coesistenza di SharePoint/WSS e ASP.NET 2.0...

Lorenzo Barbieri @ UGIblogs! — Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:00:00 GMT

Keep the SharePoint Web Parts burning

Fear and Loathing — Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:04:00 GMT

ASP.NET 2.0 and SharePoint WebParts

Christian Nagel's OneNotes — Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:27:00 GMT

Fitz talks about web parts in SharePoint

andrew connell — Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:45:00 GMT

IMPORTANT: Web Part Development Roadmap

Jan Tielens' Bloggings — Thu, 17 Mar 2005 22:15:00 GMT

IMPORTANT: Web Part Development Roadmap

Jan's Link Blog — Thu, 17 Mar 2005 22:22:00 GMT

re: Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

Jan Tielens — Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:24:00 GMT

Hi Mike, thanks for the info! This is just what the web part developer community needs.

Mike talking about SharePoint SP2

Patrick Tisseghem's Blog — Thu, 17 Mar 2005 22:23:00 GMT

No chance to have ASP.NET 2.0 Web Parts on WSS v2

STEFANO DEMILIANI WeBlog — Thu, 17 Mar 2005 23:15:00 GMT

Linked

Mark Harrison — Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:13:00 GMT

Sharepoint SP2 and ASP.NET 2 Question - re your blog

David Taylor — Thu, 17 Mar 2005 23:31:00 GMT

Hi Mike,

I just read your blog entry, and would really like you to clarify an important issue.

When you said "installing ASP.NET 2 / VS 2005 will break WSS 2", did you mean that it will still break even if you configure the WSS 2 Website in IIS to use ASP.NET 1.1 / .NET 1.1?

I just ask because I have been running both WSS 2 and ASP.NET 2 at home on a Windows Server 2003 machine since Beta 1 (July 2004) and have not noticed anything break. Of course I made sure Sharepoint was running on ASP.NET 1.1. Are you saying that some feature is broken that I have not noticed yet?

It would be really helpful to me if you could clarify this, because I was actually hoping to run this configuration on a production box after Whidbey Beta 2 comes out.

Thanks for any clarification.

Regards,

David Taylor

re: Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

Mike Fitzmaurice — Thu, 17 Mar 2005 23:39:00 GMT

David, the bits can't even sit on the same box, period. Not until we release SP2. Sorry. Until then, you'd need to use a VPC approach if you have everything on one box.

re: Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

SBC — Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:43:00 GMT

thanks for the posting.. it's good to get a glimpse of future SP developments.

re: Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

EROL — Fri, 18 Mar 2005 04:50:00 GMT

Thanks EROL MVP SharePoint http://www.mysps.info/default.aspx

ASP.NET 2.0 Web Parts

MrDave's Blog! — Fri, 18 Mar 2005 07:23:00 GMT

Mike Fitzmaurice

SharePoint, SharePoint and stuff — Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:50:00 GMT

Mike Fitzmaurice hat in einem Artikel Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006 einige sehr interessante Aussichten auf die zuk

Mike Fitzmaurice

SharePoint, SharePoint and stuff — Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:51:00 GMT

Mike Fitzmaurice hat in einem Artikel Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006 einige sehr interessante Aussichten auf die zuk

WSS v3, WSS SP2 and .NET v2 planning

Dave Burke's Blog — Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:45:00 GMT

Sharepoint and ASP.NET 2.0 Webparts

Venkatarangan's Blog [வெங்கடரங்கன் வலைப்பதிவு] — Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:45:00 GMT

SharePoint: the road ahead

Dino Esposito's WebLog — Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:49:00 GMT

SharePoint: the road ahead

Dino Esposito's WebLog — Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:58:00 GMT

re: Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

Kevin Dente — Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:46:00 GMT

Mike,
Something that isn't clear to me yet - will existing Sharepoint Web Parts be able to run on ASP.NET 2.0? It would be great if, for example, we could take advantage of the Office Web Parts in our Whidbey apps without waiting for v3.

re: Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

Mike Fitzmaurice — Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:18:00 GMT

Kevin, that third bullet point above must have gotten lost in the shuffle: ASP.NET 2.0–only sites that do not involve SharePoint technology will only run ASP.NET 2.0 Web Parts. I'm sure that independent developers and ISVs will produce charting and Web capture Web Parts for Whidbey pretty soon.

re: Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

Kevin Dente — Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:15:00 GMT

Ah, so THAT's what that bullet point meant. The wording was a bit confusing.

The comment that I'd seen here:
http://blogs.msdn.com/bowerm/archive/2004/09/17/230801.aspx
indicated otherwise, but I guess I misinterpreted it.

Any idea if/when the MS teams (like the Office WebPart folks) will be releasing Whidbey versions of their Parts? Will we need to wait for the next version of Office for that?

Thanks for the info.

Windows SharePoint Service (.NEXT) to use ASP.NET 2.0 Web Parts

Ponder .NET — Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:44:00 GMT

Des clarifications sur la prochaine version de WSS et les Web Parts d'ASP.NET 2.0

Christophe Lauer — Sat, 19 Mar 2005 08:39:00 GMT

What about WSRP?

hitesh — Sun, 20 Mar 2005 00:10:00 GMT

Any word on WSRP support?

Thanks.

ASP.NET 2.0 web parts and Sharepoint Service(WSS)

Saravana's Blog — Sun, 20 Mar 2005 05:21:00 GMT

ASP.NET 2.0 web parts and Sharepoint Service(WSS)

Good Article on the future of web part development in asp.net 2.0

Brian E. Cooper — Sun, 20 Mar 2005 06:26:00 GMT

.Net 2.0 Breaking WSS and SPS

Sean's Blog — Mon, 21 Mar 2005 02:22:00 GMT

Voci sulla roadmap in vista di SharePoint v3

Igor Macori — Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:45:00 GMT

WTF! You can't use ASP.NET 2.0 on a box with Sharepoint installed!

Scott Galloway's Personal Blog — Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:22:00 GMT

Sharepoint v3 "facts"

Mart Muller's Sharepoint Weblog — Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:47:00 GMT

re: Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

Sean Allen — Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:00:00 GMT

Awesome Navigator and I have found many uses - Question - is there a way to change the navigator to go to Document Library views

Whidbey ASP.NET and Windows SharePoint Services WebParts

Mike Taulty's Weblog — Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:58:00 GMT

Calling all SharePoint developers .. again!

Lawrence Liu's Report from the Field — Tue, 22 Mar 2005 05:54:00 GMT

The webpart story between SharePoint and ASP.NET 2.0

CaPo's Integration adventures — Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:33:00 GMT

The webpart story between SharePoint and ASP.NET 2.0

CaPo's Integration adventures — Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:49:00 GMT

re: Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

Leon Jollans — Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:54:00 GMT

To second David Taylor's experience, we have ASP.NET 2.0 ( from SQL 2005 beta 2 ) installed on a Server 2003 instance that is also hosting an SPS 2003 installation.

Sharepoint is fine, and in fact, Sharepoint is using the SQL 2005 as a data store with no problems either.

We have found out already that SPS will not run if the ASP.NET version is set to 2.0, but this does not seem to prevent us running an active 2.0 CLR on the machine. I was under the impression that the two CLR runtimes were mutually exclusive anyway, so this doesn't surprise me.

Could you elaborate on why the two bits cannot even sit on the same box, period, since this is not our experience.

Thanks Mike

Leon Jollans

re: Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

Mike Fitzmaurice — Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:24:00 GMT

My warnings are official ones. Our testers and engineers have warned against doing this. Our support people have said in no uncertain terms that they won't support this. If you've managed to make it work in an experimental environment, more power to you. But don't deploy it if you want to stay supported.

re: Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

Sean Harms — Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:16:00 GMT

Thanks for the information Mike. I've been searching for 30 minutes trying to find out some of these details.

I would like to ask:

Is it possible to take a traditional SharePoint webpart like MSNBC Weather (with a simple <content> tag) and convert it to the new ASP.NET 2.0 webpart schema (which includes <genericWebPartProperties> for example)? Basically, I would just like to use some existing webparts within the new Whidbey framework. I realize you've mentioned that it should "only run ASP.NET 2.0 Web Parts", but is there any way to convert simple ones to the new import format? I am unable to find a reference for the import format at this time.

Thanks for any input you could offer.

re: Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

Leon Jollans — Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:00:00 GMT

For the record, we haven't had to perform any trickery to get it working, it just worked. But thanks for the info Mike.

Leon Jollans

Can Sharepoint V2 work with .net 2.0?

Kit Kai's Blog — Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:15:00 GMT

http://blogs.msdn.com/mikefitz/archive/2005/03/17/397775.aspx
The link above says cannot, until sp2...

Keep writing web parts!

LeonLandGersing.com : Powered by Poem — Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:33:00 GMT

Unless of couse you want to use them next year. :) It would seem that all of us out there that are licking our lips over the new web part for ASP.NET 2.0 will not be able to use what we create for the Sharepoint v2 framework. So, those crazy (non-documented) web parts that I've looked into developing for Sharepoint will not be quite as ubiqutous as I once thought...

ASP.NET 2.0 and SP WebParts

The Weblog of Joe Schneebaum — Fri, 01 Apr 2005 18:56:00 GMT

The real skinny on compatibility: SharePoint v2, v3, Whidbey, .NET 2.0, webparts

greg hughes - dot - net — Tue, 05 Apr 2005 08:46:17 GMT

The real skinny on compatibility: SharePoint v2, v3, Whidbey, .NET 2.0, webparts

greg hughes - dot - net — Tue, 05 Apr 2005 08:46:18 GMT

The real skinny on compatibility: SharePoint v2, v3, Whidbey, .NET 2.0, webparts

greg hughes - dot - net — Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:50:12 GMT

The real skinny on compatibility: SharePoint v2, v3, Whidbey, .NET 2.0, webparts

greg hughes - dot - net — Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:50:13 GMT

Voci sulla roadmap in vista di SharePoint v3

Igor Macori — Wed, 20 Apr 2005 12:19:36 GMT

re: Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

Vijay — Thu, 05 May 2005 07:30:28 GMT

I could use both FW 2.0 and WSS together!

Modifications need to be done in IIS.

Open IIS
Go to Properties of DefaultWebsite or SharePoint site.

Go to tab 'ASP.NET'

Here, you can choose the ASP.NET version.

That's all

re: Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

Kevin Julien — Wed, 18 May 2005 13:40:17 GMT

Thanks for the information. We are working through the dialog right now and are considering Sharepoint vs. .Net Nuke beacuse of concerns with Web Pars and code. One of the concerns that we have is around the best practices of using Web Parts and re-thinkng how we leverage portal technology without incorporating all application logic into the portal framework. Are there best practices or guidelines here? Do you have any guidance on the two technologies to help us with this discussion?

Thanks in advance.

Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

C#, XML Web services, and .NET Servers — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 09:31:09 GMT

re: Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

Stephen Walch — Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:08:28 GMT

Hi Fitz, Thanks for the info. Our WSS V2 product consists of both web parts, pieces in a wpresources directory, and full pages in the _layouts directory. Should all this be able to run as expected under ASP.NET 2.0?
Will my WPPACKAGER packages work at deployment time?

SharePoint and ASP.NET 2.0

Adventure Girl — Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:25:02 GMT

A colleague just asked me if I could provide a pointer to any information regarding the interaction /...

re: Whidbey ASP.NET and Windows SharePoint Services WebParts

Mike Taulty's Weblog — Fri, 26 Aug 2005 01:53:24 GMT

question

asane — Sun, 25 Sep 2005 12:32:15 GMT

Hi can you tell me how to get .Net to do webparts. I know that I have to mention the path to MicroSoft.Sharepoint.dll, but I simply can't find it; hence I cannot install the template.

So any help on this would be nice.

collabnet.ch » Blog Archive » Microsoft SharePoint Products and Technologies 2007: Deployment and Administration - Part 2

Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:25:19 GMT

PingBack from http://collabnet.ch/blogoli/?p=83

Famous Quotes » FitzBlog : Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until (at least) 2006

Sat, 05 Jan 2008 12:06:15 GMT

PingBack from http://famousquotes.247blogging.info/?p=717

collabnet.ch » Microsoft SharePoint Products and Technologies 2007: Deployment and Administration - Part 2

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:12:00 GMT

PingBack from http://collabnet.ch/blog/?p=50

Microsoft SharePoint Products and Technologies 2007: Deployment and Administration - Part 2 « collabnet.ch

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:39:31 GMT

PingBack from http://blog.collabnet.ch/blog/?p=49

FitzBlog Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until at least 2006 | Toe Nail Fungus

FitzBlog Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until at least 2006 | Toe Nail Fungus — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 08:49:53 GMT

PingBack from http://toenailfungusite.info/story.php?id=5328

FitzBlog Keep Writing SharePoint Web Parts Until at least 2006 | alternative dating

Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:01:10 GMT

PingBack from http://topalternativedating.info/story.php?id=2804