<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Image Capture and Auto-Resize With Cropper</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mikeormond/archive/2008/06/06/image-capture-and-auto-resize-with-cropper.aspx</link><description>Having talked about the pain of capturing image snapshots , someone mentioned Cropper and its plug-in model so I thought I'd have a bash at creating a plug-in to optionally re-size on capture. Using these helpful articles ( here and here ) on using the</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Image Capture and Auto-Resize With Cropper</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mikeormond/archive/2008/06/06/image-capture-and-auto-resize-with-cropper.aspx#8577645</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:08:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8577645</guid><dc:creator>Sergei Golubev</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Quite an interesting example on the UI for image cropping: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://fastcoder.org/demo/FC-CropResizer/v0.0.1/demo.html"&gt;http://fastcoder.org/demo/FC-CropResizer/v0.0.1/demo.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Image Capture and Auto-Resize With Cropper</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mikeormond/archive/2008/06/06/image-capture-and-auto-resize-with-cropper.aspx#8586319</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:14:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8586319</guid><dc:creator>Joe Cheng [MSFT]</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I believe WLW uses bicubic high quality internally as well. We used to have really poor resampling quality but should be fixed in the RTM and later. Are you seeing significant quality differences versus inserting the capture at full size and letting WLW do the resize?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Image Capture and Auto-Resize With Cropper</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mikeormond/archive/2008/06/06/image-capture-and-auto-resize-with-cropper.aspx#8589430</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:52:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8589430</guid><dc:creator>MikeOrmond</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Joe. No, I haven't seen any issues - that wasn't the driver for me. I wanted to further automate the process, add high quality drop-shadow (I'm not that fond of the drop-shadow effect in WLW) and create something that can be used outside of WLW as well. So for me, a tool that captures, optionally resizes and optionally adds a nice dropshadow is ideal. Mike&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Testing My Cropper Screen Capture Utility</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mikeormond/archive/2008/06/06/image-capture-and-auto-resize-with-cropper.aspx#8622433</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:25:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8622433</guid><dc:creator>Mike Ormond's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Today has not been a great day. Back here I talked about trying to improve my workflow for getting screenshots&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>