http://blogs.msdn.com/mikhailarkhipov/archive/2004/07/22/191682.aspxThis post reminded me on the case when C++ compiler warnings caused me more grief than benefits. I spent some time yesterday making some [previously external] component to use asserts defined in VS headers instead of its own internal ones. Most of theen-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.msdn.com/mikhailarkhipov/archive/2004/07/22/191682.aspx#191689Fri, 23 Jul 2004 01:45:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:191689Cyrus' Blatherhttp://blogs.msdn.com/mikhailarkhipov/archive/2004/07/22/191682.aspx#192312Fri, 23 Jul 2004 09:16:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:192312asdfMaybe you guys should implement _Pragma from C99 finally so you can temporarily disable this warning in macros.http://blogs.msdn.com/mikhailarkhipov/archive/2004/07/22/191682.aspx#193280Fri, 23 Jul 2004 18:31:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:193280Mikhail Arkhipov (MSFT)In fact, there is a pragma for that in the compiler, but build system may have it disabled since otherwise people may start adding disabling pragmas and we end up with poor code which just seems to be compiling under W4.http://blogs.msdn.com/mikhailarkhipov/archive/2004/07/22/191682.aspx#207803Wed, 04 Aug 2004 10:05:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:207803Cyrus NajmabadiMichael: Can't you just Push/Pop away that warning? <br> <br>Also, stick shifts suck. I know, I've got one. You need to drive a real car to realize it though :-)http://blogs.msdn.com/mikhailarkhipov/archive/2004/07/22/191682.aspx#209007Thu, 05 Aug 2004 19:00:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:209007Mikhail Arkhipov (MSFT)'s WebLog