<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>&amp;quot;Common Language Runtime detected an invalid program&amp;quot; - InvalidProgramException  - When your application has a really large method.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mjeelani/archive/2006/12/09/common-language-runtime-detected-an-invalid-program-invalidprogramexception-when-your-application-has-a-really-large-method.aspx</link><description>If you've written a whole bunch (and I mean a really big WHOLE bunch) of code inside a method, constructor or the like, there is a good chance you'll see this exception. We had an application that would generate an Assembly using CodeDom based on certain</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: "Common Language Runtime detected an invalid program" - InvalidProgramException  - When your application has a really large method.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mjeelani/archive/2006/12/09/common-language-runtime-detected-an-invalid-program-invalidprogramexception-when-your-application-has-a-really-large-method.aspx#1244665</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 11:41:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1244665</guid><dc:creator>oidon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Increasing the limit is an easy fix. However, was it intentionally restricted to 32,767? I am not sure that I am comfortable having a few million local variables in a single method. What is the desired functionality?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: "Common Language Runtime detected an invalid program" - InvalidProgramException  - When your application has a really large method.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mjeelani/archive/2006/12/09/common-language-runtime-detected-an-invalid-program-invalidprogramexception-when-your-application-has-a-really-large-method.aspx#1251589</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:21:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1251589</guid><dc:creator>mjeelani</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;I am not sure that I am comfortable having a few million local variables in a single method&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[mjeelani] You are right - you shouldn't be comfortable till you break that method into multiple methods and do an aggressive code review on it. However, from a framework perspective I think the 32767 limit was being hit very often especially by the COBOL developers hence I believe the limit was increased.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>InvalidProgramException - Though a very small method.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mjeelani/archive/2006/12/09/common-language-runtime-detected-an-invalid-program-invalidprogramexception-when-your-application-has-a-really-large-method.aspx#2393978</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 16:41:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2393978</guid><dc:creator>Gaurav</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a method with just a few lines of code and there is a call to another method from there which never takes place!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The exception is exactly what has been described.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: "Common Language Runtime detected an invalid program" - InvalidProgramException  - When your application has a really large method.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mjeelani/archive/2006/12/09/common-language-runtime-detected-an-invalid-program-invalidprogramexception-when-your-application-has-a-really-large-method.aspx#5160993</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:09:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5160993</guid><dc:creator>Mohammad Reza Jooyandeh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a mixture of .NET 2.0 and VC++6.0 code. I wrote my coclass in VC and implement IList, ICollection and IEnumerable which are comvisible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then I used the coclass in .NET because of that implementation I can use the object as an ICollection object. But whenever I call one its methods I caught an InvalidProgramException.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How should I do?!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>The Worst Bug Ever</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mjeelani/archive/2006/12/09/common-language-runtime-detected-an-invalid-program-invalidprogramexception-when-your-application-has-a-really-large-method.aspx#6526448</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:26:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6526448</guid><dc:creator>Danie Bruwer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I do support on a SharePoint Portal (2003, Framework 1.1). Last week after we deployed some new functionality&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: "Common Language Runtime detected an invalid program" - InvalidProgramException  - When your application has a really large method.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mjeelani/archive/2006/12/09/common-language-runtime-detected-an-invalid-program-invalidprogramexception-when-your-application-has-a-really-large-method.aspx#7722621</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:42:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7722621</guid><dc:creator>Allen B. Taylor</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I got this exception in a C++/CLI app built in release mode (debug mode works fine). It happens when a native method is called from another native method. The call never happens. Disabling optimization on the called module has fixed the problem. Nasty.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: "Common Language Runtime detected an invalid program" - InvalidProgramException  - When your application has a really large method.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mjeelani/archive/2006/12/09/common-language-runtime-detected-an-invalid-program-invalidprogramexception-when-your-application-has-a-really-large-method.aspx#8716336</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:20:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8716336</guid><dc:creator>Ku Prabhu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you so much dudes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now its working fine to me. After I break into many methods from one large method(39087 lines).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks a lot once again.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: "Common Language Runtime detected an invalid program" - InvalidProgramException  - When your application has a really large method.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mjeelani/archive/2006/12/09/common-language-runtime-detected-an-invalid-program-invalidprogramexception-when-your-application-has-a-really-large-method.aspx#9455221</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:28:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9455221</guid><dc:creator>Llyle</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I managed to get this exception while using Test Driven .Net with a RowTest (which is smallish). A simple solution recompile fixed this for me.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: "Common Language Runtime detected an invalid program" - InvalidProgramException  - When your application has a really large method.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mjeelani/archive/2006/12/09/common-language-runtime-detected-an-invalid-program-invalidprogramexception-when-your-application-has-a-really-large-method.aspx#9877933</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:16:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9877933</guid><dc:creator>Troy Howard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@Allen B. Taylor - If you still want optimization turned on the for rest of the code, but just want to avoid this exception scenario, you can decorate the sensitive methods with [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.NoOptimization)] attribute and the compiler will skip optimizations for that method. I had to do that in a recent program that was doing some byte to struct mapping stuff using Marshal.StructureToPtr/PtrToStructure, etc.. Compiler couldn't figure it out, and so, decorating those &amp;quot;low level&amp;quot; methods that moved the byte data around with that attribute allowed me to get a good build with optimization turned on for the rest of the code. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope that helps, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Troy&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>