http://blogs.msdn.com/monad/archive/2006/02/08/527713.aspxIn response to the recent Days till Xmas post, applepwc asked the question &gt; where can I find more ".NET types"?I mean is there a list of ".NET type" available in monad? Excellent question but there are a number of aspects to it so let's break it down:en-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.msdn.com/monad/archive/2006/02/08/527713.aspx#528135Thu, 09 Feb 2006 04:15:51 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:528135applepwcGreat post. <br />Thanks very much!http://blogs.msdn.com/monad/archive/2006/02/08/527713.aspx#528755Thu, 09 Feb 2006 21:04:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:528755DontBotherMeWithSpam&gt; I use this quite a bit actually. &nbsp;I create a function Match-Type <br /> <br />I think this kind of blog post which gives people pointers on what can be done is really great and fun to read. <br /> <br />With these insights in mind, we could be more adventurous. &nbsp;Oh yeah, while at it, why don't you give us certain problems for us to work with as well? &nbsp;:)http://blogs.msdn.com/monad/archive/2006/02/08/527713.aspx#540590Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:16:40 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:540590Andrey SkvortsovDon't you think that &quot;foreach&quot; is more like &quot;select&quot;?And it would be helpful to exchange semantics between both,because most of the time under &quot;foreach&quot; you mean &quot;select&quot; and current &quot;select&quot; semantics is more confusing than &quot;foreach&quot;. <br> <br>Thanks.