<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Advances in .NET Type system: Type Equivalence Demo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mshneer/archive/2008/10/28/advances-in-net-type-system-type-equivalence-demo.aspx</link><description>I just finished my PDC session at Los Angeles where we introduced Type Embedding support in the compilers and Type Equivalence support in the CLR. Some people I talked to after the session were very enthusiastic about the whole thing and I did get comments</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Advances in .NET Type system: Type Equivalence Demo | MS Tech News</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mshneer/archive/2008/10/28/advances-in-net-type-system-type-equivalence-demo.aspx#9020497</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:08:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9020497</guid><dc:creator>Advances in .NET Type system: Type Equivalence Demo | MS Tech News</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://mstechnews.info/2008/10/advances-in-net-type-system-type-equivalence-demo/"&gt;http://mstechnews.info/2008/10/advances-in-net-type-system-type-equivalence-demo/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Advances in .NET Type System</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mshneer/archive/2008/10/28/advances-in-net-type-system-type-equivalence-demo.aspx#9020684</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:35:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9020684</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Whitechapel</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Here at PDC, Misha Shneerson has just delivered a talk on a couple of very interesting new features provided&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>The Return of the GUID</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mshneer/archive/2008/10/28/advances-in-net-type-system-type-equivalence-demo.aspx#9023087</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:53:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9023087</guid><dc:creator>public class Alon : ISmartHome, ICPP, IHomeServer, IMediaCenter</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the main problems of COM interop is the need to distribute the interop libraries with your application&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Advances in .NET Type system: Type Equivalence Demo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mshneer/archive/2008/10/28/advances-in-net-type-system-type-equivalence-demo.aspx#9141456</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:34:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9141456</guid><dc:creator>Gilles Michard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It makes me think of that as a special &amp;quot;duck typing&amp;quot; use case.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Launching Office Apps Programmatically</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mshneer/archive/2008/10/28/advances-in-net-type-system-type-equivalence-demo.aspx#9304746</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:44:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9304746</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Whitechapel</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;There are at least 9 different ways to start or connect to an Office app programmatically in managed&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>