<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>RIA is slowly fading in terms of it's definition.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/msmossyblog/archive/2008/04/20/ria-is-slowly-fading-in-terms-of-it-s-definition.aspx</link><description>When I first started the RIA Evangelism role in Microsoft, I had this nagging feeling that the term RIA was just all over the place. Depending on which technology you are backing and which stream of alliance you uphold, the truth is the term was destined</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>The Spectrum of RIA</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/msmossyblog/archive/2008/04/20/ria-is-slowly-fading-in-terms-of-it-s-definition.aspx#8412332</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:42:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8412332</guid><dc:creator>Joe Blogs</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ryan Stewart has a great post about where we are with the definition of RIA, and Scott Barnes continues&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: RIA is slowly fading in terms of it's definition.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/msmossyblog/archive/2008/04/20/ria-is-slowly-fading-in-terms-of-it-s-definition.aspx#8531385</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 09:15:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8531385</guid><dc:creator>justinfreitag@mac.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I could care less about the term RIA...as you mention its over-used, widely misunderstood, and isn't particularly helpful when you're trying to embark on move away from more traditional server-side rendering technologies. &amp;nbsp;I don't believe that Rich Client Platform hits the mark either - the term &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; is far too often misunderstood. &amp;nbsp;The strength behind these UI platforms (flex/AIR, silverlight/WPF) is the thick client abilities, coupled with a flexible component architecture and simple integration with the server tier (note that AJAX is not mentioned) &amp;nbsp;These strengths contribute to adding real business value through supporting 1) rapid/agile design/development approaches, 2) quicker time to market, and 3) are more likely to meet and exceed customer expectations. &amp;nbsp; 6 years ago I was building application UI's in JavaWebStart and Swing which proved very productive and successful, however the market largely pursued server-side MVC frameworks such as Struts and/or Portlets which offered no where near the benefits of the former. &amp;nbsp;I'm glad to see the pendulum finally swing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>