<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Different Execution Patterns with WF (or, Going beyond Sequential and State Machine)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mwinkle/archive/2007/05/24/different-execution-patterns-with-wf-or-going-beyond-sequential-and-state-machine.aspx</link><description>How do I do this? A lot of times people get stuck with the impression that there are only two workflow models available: sequential and state machine. True, out of the box these are the two that are built in, but only because there are is a set of common</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>WF: Recopilación de algunas cosas interesantes!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mwinkle/archive/2007/05/24/different-execution-patterns-with-wf-or-going-beyond-sequential-and-state-machine.aspx#2961325</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 09:35:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2961325</guid><dc:creator>Blog del CIIN</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Siguiendo con el rescate de algunos de los posts publicados en nuestro blog , en este post voy a hacer&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Pageflow Questions: Why not a state machine?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mwinkle/archive/2007/05/24/different-execution-patterns-with-wf-or-going-beyond-sequential-and-state-machine.aspx#3297403</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:04:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3297403</guid><dc:creator>Matt W's Windows Workflow Place</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's a comment from my initial post introducing the pageflow sample from wleong: NavigatorWorkflow&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Implementing the N of M Pattern in WF</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mwinkle/archive/2007/05/24/different-execution-patterns-with-wf-or-going-beyond-sequential-and-state-machine.aspx#3556625</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 03:38:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3556625</guid><dc:creator>Matt W's Windows Workflow Place</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The second in my series of alternate execution patterns ( part 1 ) I recently worked with a customer&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>New and Notable 175</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mwinkle/archive/2007/05/24/different-execution-patterns-with-wf-or-going-beyond-sequential-and-state-machine.aspx#3563299</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:28:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3563299</guid><dc:creator>Sam Gentile</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Temps near 100 F and 100% humidity make for some pretty uncomfortable days Windows Workflow Sometimes&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Different Execution Patterns with WF (or, Going beyond Sequential and State Machine)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mwinkle/archive/2007/05/24/different-execution-patterns-with-wf-or-going-beyond-sequential-and-state-machine.aspx#3735822</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 02:51:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3735822</guid><dc:creator>mstiefel</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Should you be looping through the Activities collection?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;foreach (Activity a in this.Activities)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Shouldn't you use the EnabledActivities collection just in case there is a cancellation handler or fault handlers activity for the composite activity?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Different Execution Patterns with WF (or, Going beyond Sequential and State Machine)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mwinkle/archive/2007/05/24/different-execution-patterns-with-wf-or-going-beyond-sequential-and-state-machine.aspx#3943715</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:18:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3943715</guid><dc:creator>mwinkle</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good catch mstiefel. &amp;nbsp;I always forget about EnabledActivities when I put these things together. &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>New and Notable 175</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/mwinkle/archive/2007/05/24/different-execution-patterns-with-wf-or-going-beyond-sequential-and-state-machine.aspx#6739799</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:20:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6739799</guid><dc:creator>Sam Gentile</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Temps near 100 F and 100% humidity make for some pretty uncomfortable days Windows Workflow Sometimes&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>