<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Baby steps in opening the product</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/netmfteam/archive/2009/06/15/baby-steps-in-opening-the-product.aspx</link><description>As you all know, we are working through all the issues associated with moving the product from a revenue model to an 'open' model. That will all take place with the next release as promised earlier. In the interim, we are taking some steps with the 3.0</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>infoblog &amp;raquo; Baby steps in opening the product</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/netmfteam/archive/2009/06/15/baby-steps-in-opening-the-product.aspx#9757076</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:50:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9757076</guid><dc:creator>infoblog &amp;raquo; Baby steps in opening the product</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.a-foton.ru/index.php/2009/06/16/baby-steps-in-opening-the-product/"&gt;http://blog.a-foton.ru/index.php/2009/06/16/baby-steps-in-opening-the-product/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Le Porting Kit du .NET MicroFramework est maintenant disponible gratuitement</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/netmfteam/archive/2009/06/15/baby-steps-in-opening-the-product.aspx#9760383</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:13:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9760383</guid><dc:creator>Pierre's Embedded and Mobile Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Petit &amp;#224; petit, le .NET MicroFramework va devenir Open Source. C’est ce qu’annon&amp;#231;ait Colin Miller, la&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Baby steps in opening the product</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/netmfteam/archive/2009/06/15/baby-steps-in-opening-the-product.aspx#9762357</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:53:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9762357</guid><dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is this still timebombed? Whats going on in the licensing department?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Baby steps in opening the product</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/netmfteam/archive/2009/06/15/baby-steps-in-opening-the-product.aspx#9762383</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:09:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9762383</guid><dc:creator>Elze Kool</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The blog lines call this a baby step but I find releasing the Porting Kit for free a big step. I hope people or companies see the potential of this and build/release their port. Maybe it helps that the can peek into the source and look if they are up to the task.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I see a new great future for Micro Framework!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Baby steps in opening the product</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/netmfteam/archive/2009/06/15/baby-steps-in-opening-the-product.aspx#9762490</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:08:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9762490</guid><dc:creator>NETMF Team Bloggers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ray asks if this is the timb-bombed verion - I should have covered that. &amp;nbsp;This is the same 3.0 time-bombed version that we had before. We have removed the time-bomb for the version that is coming out soon. &amp;nbsp;I am counting on people not wanting to ship new products on 3.0 in the next few months while we work out the licensing. &amp;nbsp;If that is not the case, we will address that on an individual basis. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Baby steps in opening the product</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/netmfteam/archive/2009/06/15/baby-steps-in-opening-the-product.aspx#9762690</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:10:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9762690</guid><dc:creator>Aby Mammen Mathew</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Its great, you have ability to try to port to other platforms and reuse functionality.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All they are saying is 30 days for the development image deployed on the target board, if its production then might as well buy the license and get additional support from MS off course :-).&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Baby steps in opening the product</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/netmfteam/archive/2009/06/15/baby-steps-in-opening-the-product.aspx#9793667</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:39:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9793667</guid><dc:creator>Aby Mammen Mathew</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I was just curious, how is the deployed image time bombed, there is no RTC on the board. How does it keep track.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;:-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Baby steps in opening the product</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/netmfteam/archive/2009/06/15/baby-steps-in-opening-the-product.aspx#9800897</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:29:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9800897</guid><dc:creator>Carlo Mendoza</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What does this mean for older hardware? Will this open up the possibility for updating .netMF version 2.0 hardware to the most current? I'd really like to try out the latest .netMF on my old 2.0 hardware. How hard would it be to do this?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Baby steps in opening the product</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/netmfteam/archive/2009/06/15/baby-steps-in-opening-the-product.aspx#9809772</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:05:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9809772</guid><dc:creator>NETMF Team Bloggers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Carlo asked about updating hardware with a 2.0 port to it. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; The best option is to check with the vendor and see if they dont have plans to update it themselves. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; The next best option is to see if that port is part the the porting kit samples. &amp;nbsp;If so, you have a good start.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; If neither of the first two options is open, you still have the option of starting your own port. &amp;nbsp;We woudl of course encourage you to share that with teh community so that everyone doesn't have to repeat that work. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; If you have any questions about avialable ports to specific boards, you can 'Ask Colin'.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Baby steps in opening the product</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/netmfteam/archive/2009/06/15/baby-steps-in-opening-the-product.aspx#9823951</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:45:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9823951</guid><dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does Microsoft plan to open to CLR source code?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is important for supporting processors, compilers etc. that are not currently support by the Micro Framework&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Baby steps in opening the product</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/netmfteam/archive/2009/06/15/baby-steps-in-opening-the-product.aspx#9823979</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:04:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9823979</guid><dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Aby Mammen, the time is the time that the CLR is up and running. Hence it is only necessary to track the time used via the timer services built into the CLR (via hardware support). The time used/remaining is written back to the flash. This is inspected at boot, and if the time is up the CLR will not boot. &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>