<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Why is the Silverlight Key enum missing common characters like comma and period?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickkramer/archive/2009/01/23/why-is-the-silverlight-key-enum-missing-common-characters-like-comma-and-period.aspx</link><description>Short version is, the keys we left out are harder than you might think to support, and they weren't necessary for the scenarios we focused on (tabbing around forms, writing common controls, accelerated keys, etc.). The longer version requires a little</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Nick on Silverlight and WPF : Why is the Silverlight Key enum missing common characters like comma and period?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickkramer/archive/2009/01/23/why-is-the-silverlight-key-enum-missing-common-characters-like-comma-and-period.aspx#9372306</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:49:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9372306</guid><dc:creator>Nick on Silverlight and WPF : Why is the Silverlight Key enum missing common characters like comma and period?</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/nickkramer/archive/2009/01/23/why-is-the-silverlight-key-enum-missing-common-characters-like-comma-and-period.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/nickkramer/archive/2009/01/23/why-is-the-silverlight-key-enum-missing-common-characters-like-comma-and-period.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Why is the Silverlight Key enum missing common characters like comma and period?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickkramer/archive/2009/01/23/why-is-the-silverlight-key-enum-missing-common-characters-like-comma-and-period.aspx#9372638</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:58:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9372638</guid><dc:creator>Christopher Bennage</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I appreciate decisions like this. Thanks for posting about it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Why is the Silverlight Key enum missing common characters like comma and period?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickkramer/archive/2009/01/23/why-is-the-silverlight-key-enum-missing-common-characters-like-comma-and-period.aspx#9372834</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:40:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9372834</guid><dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for posting this. &amp;nbsp;Good place to send whiners on the forums when they complain about Silverlight &amp;quot;missing&amp;quot; features&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Why is the Silverlight Key enum missing common characters like comma and period?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickkramer/archive/2009/01/23/why-is-the-silverlight-key-enum-missing-common-characters-like-comma-and-period.aspx#9374835</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:51:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9374835</guid><dc:creator>Stefan Dobrev</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice. Just an idea: you can provide a utility library with helpful extension methods that do the heavy lifting as part of the SDK :) &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Why is the Silverlight Key enum missing common characters like comma and period?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickkramer/archive/2009/01/23/why-is-the-silverlight-key-enum-missing-common-characters-like-comma-and-period.aspx#9458587</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:22:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9458587</guid><dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Although this makes sense from a programmers &amp;quot;we can't deliver everything at once&amp;quot; perspective... I will say this: &amp;nbsp;This type of limited implementation sucks and is a total drain on programmers time in the real world. &amp;nbsp;What you should have done is for real characters pass the 'character' as an additional event arg. (and null for non-displayable characters) .. this would have prevented the need for any further changes going forward.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>