<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Is Durability in messaging 'bad'?  Libor thinks so.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2007/07/19/is-durability-in-messaging-bad-libor-thinks-so.aspx</link><description>Thanks to Harry Pierson for pointing out an interesting post from Libor Soucek . He links to Harry and myself and states, basically, that durable messaging is not needed. The logic is a bit hard to follow (possible due to the lack of a paragraph break</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Durable Messages Still Losing Over Redundancy and EDA &amp;laquo; Libor.SOUCEK(&amp;#8221;WEBLog&amp;#8221;)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2007/07/19/is-durability-in-messaging-bad-libor-thinks-so.aspx#3981185</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 01:13:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3981185</guid><dc:creator>Durable Messages Still Losing Over Redundancy and EDA « Libor.SOUCEK(”WEBLog”)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://lsblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/21/durable-messages-still-losing-over-redundancy-and-eda/"&gt;http://lsblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/21/durable-messages-still-losing-over-redundancy-and-eda/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Is Durability in messaging 'bad'?  Libor thinks so.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2007/07/19/is-durability-in-messaging-bad-libor-thinks-so.aspx#3981307</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 01:18:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3981307</guid><dc:creator>Libor</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It turns out I have written rather extended comment so did it as post and I'm linking it here only: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://lsblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/21/durable-messages-still-losing-over-redundancy-and-eda/"&gt;http://lsblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/21/durable-messages-still-losing-over-redundancy-and-eda/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>New and Notable 178</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2007/07/19/is-durability-in-messaging-bad-libor-thinks-so.aspx#4012094</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:37:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4012094</guid><dc:creator>Sam Gentile</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;My son, like the rest of kids his age, as well as many others is spending every waking hour reading the&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>New and Notable 178</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2007/07/19/is-durability-in-messaging-bad-libor-thinks-so.aspx#9167576</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 04:35:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9167576</guid><dc:creator>Sam Gentile's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;My son, like the rest of kids his age, as well as many others is spending every waking hour reading the latest Potter book. Ruby/IronRuby/CLR/DLR Great news from John Lam of the first public drop of the IronRuby source code . IronRuby is licensed under&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>